From: tip-bot for Shaohua Li <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, riel@redhat.com,
shli@fusionio.com, mgorman@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
shli@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: In the PTE swapout page reclaim case clear the accessed bit instead of flushing the TLB
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:40:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-b13b1d2d8692b437203de7a404c6b809d2cc4d99@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140408075809.GA1764@kernel.org>
Commit-ID: b13b1d2d8692b437203de7a404c6b809d2cc4d99
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b13b1d2d8692b437203de7a404c6b809d2cc4d99
Author: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:58:09 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:57:08 +0200
x86/mm: In the PTE swapout page reclaim case clear the accessed bit instead of flushing the TLB
We use the accessed bit to age a page at page reclaim time,
and currently we also flush the TLB when doing so.
But in some workloads TLB flush overhead is very heavy. In my
simple multithreaded app with a lot of swap to several pcie
SSDs, removing the tlb flush gives about 20% ~ 30% swapout
speedup.
Fortunately just removing the TLB flush is a valid optimization:
on x86 CPUs, clearing the accessed bit without a TLB flush
doesn't cause data corruption.
It could cause incorrect page aging and the (mistaken) reclaim of
hot pages, but the chance of that should be relatively low.
So as a performance optimization don't flush the TLB when
clearing the accessed bit, it will eventually be flushed by
a context switch or a VM operation anyway. [ In the rare
event of it not getting flushed for a long time the delay
shouldn't really matter because there's no real memory
pressure for swapout to react to. ]
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140408075809.GA1764@kernel.org
[ Rewrote the changelog and the code comments. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
index c96314a..0004ac7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -399,13 +399,20 @@ int pmdp_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep)
{
- int young;
-
- young = ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, ptep);
- if (young)
- flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
-
- return young;
+ /*
+ * On x86 CPUs, clearing the accessed bit without a TLB flush
+ * doesn't cause data corruption. [ It could cause incorrect
+ * page aging and the (mistaken) reclaim of hot pages, but the
+ * chance of that should be relatively low. ]
+ *
+ * So as a performance optimization don't flush the TLB when
+ * clearing the accessed bit, it will eventually be flushed by
+ * a context switch or a VM operation anyway. [ In the rare
+ * event of it not getting flushed for a long time the delay
+ * shouldn't really matter because there's no real memory
+ * pressure for swapout to react to. ]
+ */
+ return ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, ptep);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 0:42 [patch]x86: clearing access bit don't flush tlb Shaohua Li
2014-04-03 11:35 ` [patch] x86: " Ingo Molnar
2014-04-03 13:45 ` Shaohua Li
2014-04-04 15:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-04-08 7:58 ` Shaohua Li
2014-04-14 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: In the PTE swapout page reclaim case clear the accessed bit instead of flushing the TLB tip-bot for Shaohua Li
2014-04-16 7:40 ` tip-bot for Shaohua Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-b13b1d2d8692b437203de7a404c6b809d2cc4d99@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome