mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Thomas Richter <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, jpmv27@aim.com,
	acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	brueckner@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:52:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-b31a8cc1a53dda3a33b6c9c62779869d4d5fc142@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423082428.7930-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>

Commit-ID:  b31a8cc1a53dda3a33b6c9c62779869d4d5fc142
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/b31a8cc1a53dda3a33b6c9c62779869d4d5fc142
Author:     Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:24:28 +0200
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:04:37 -0300

perf test: Adapt test case record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh for s390

perf test case 58 (record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh) executed on s390x
using kernel 4.16.0rc3 displays this result:

 # perf trace --no-syscalls -e probe_libc:inet_pton/call-graph=dwarf/ ping -6 -c 1 ::1
     probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffa0240448)
	      __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	      gaih_inet (inlined)
	      __GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
	      main (/usr/bin/ping)
	      __libc_start_main (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	     _start (/usr/bin/ping)

After I installed kernel 4.16.0 the same tests uses commands:

 # perf record -e probe_libc:inet_pton/call-graph=dwarf/
      -o /tmp/perf.data.abc ping -6 -c 1 ::1
 # perf script -i /tmp/perf.data.abc

and displays:

 ping 39048 [006] 84230.381198: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffa0240448)
	       140448 __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	       fbde1 gaih_inet (inlined)
	       fe2b9 __GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
	        398d main (/usr/bin/ping)

Nothing else changed including glibc elfutils and other libraries picked
up by the build.

The entries for __libc_start_main and _start are missing.

I bisected missing __libc_start_main and _start to commit

Fixes: 3d20c6246690 ("perf unwind: Unwind with libdw doesn't take symfs into account")

When I undo this commit I get this call stack on s390:
 [root@s35lp76 perf]# ./perf script  -i /tmp/perf.data.abc
 ping 39048 [006] 84230.381198: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ffa0240448)
	140448 __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	 fbde1 gaih_inet (inlined)
	 fe2b9 __GI_getaddrinfo (inlined)
	  398d main (/usr/bin/ping)
	 22fbd __libc_start_main (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	  457b _start (/usr/bin/ping)

Looks like dwarf functions dwfl_xxx create different call back stack
trace when using file /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/ping-20161105-7.fc27.s390x.debug
instead of file /usr/bin/ping.

Fix this test case on s390 and do not expect any call back stack entry
after the main() function. Also be more robust and accept a leading
__GI_ prefix in front of getaddrinfo.

On x86 this test case shows the same call stack using both kernel
versions 4.16.0rc3 and 4.16.0 and also stops at main:

  [root@f27 perf]# ./perf script -i /tmp/perf.data.tmr
  ping  4446 [000]   172.027088: probe_libc:inet_pton: (7fdfa08c93c0)
	             1393c0 __GI___inet_pton (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	              fe60d getaddrinfo (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
	               2f40 main (/usr/bin/ping)
  [root@f27 perf]#

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Vuille <jpmv27@aim.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180423082428.7930-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
index 1ecc1f0ff84a..016882dbbc16 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
@@ -19,12 +19,10 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
 	expected[1]=".*inet_pton[[:space:]]\($libc\)$"
 	case "$(uname -m)" in
 	s390x)
-		eventattr='call-graph=dwarf'
+		eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
 		expected[2]="gaih_inet.*[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
-		expected[3]="__GI_getaddrinfo[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
+		expected[3]="(__GI_)?getaddrinfo[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$"
 		expected[4]="main[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
-		expected[5]="__libc_start_main[[:space:]]\($libc\)$"
-		expected[6]="_start[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
 		;;
 	*)
 		eventattr='max-stack=3'

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-26  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-23  8:24 [PATCH v2] " Thomas Richter
2018-04-23 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-04-26  5:52 ` tip-bot for Thomas Richter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-b31a8cc1a53dda3a33b6c9c62779869d4d5fc142@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpmv27@aim.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome