From: tip-bot for Andrea Parri <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com,
hpa@zytor.com, will.deacon@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/spinlocks/arm64: Remove smp_mb() from arch_spin_is_locked()
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:26:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-c6f5d02b6a0fb91be5d656885ce02cf28952181d@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526338889-7003-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Commit-ID: c6f5d02b6a0fb91be5d656885ce02cf28952181d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c6f5d02b6a0fb91be5d656885ce02cf28952181d
Author: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:01:28 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 15 May 2018 08:11:15 +0200
locking/spinlocks/arm64: Remove smp_mb() from arch_spin_is_locked()
The following commit:
38b850a73034f ("arm64: spinlock: order spin_{is_locked,unlock_wait} against local locks")
... added an smp_mb() to arch_spin_is_locked(), in order
"to ensure that the lock value is always loaded after any other locks have
been taken by the current CPU", and reported one example (the "insane case"
in ipc/sem.c) relying on such guarantee.
It is however understood that spin_is_locked() is not required to provide
such an ordering guarantee (a guarantee that is currently not provided by
all the implementations/archs), and that callers relying on such ordering
should instead insert suitable memory barriers before acting on the result
of spin_is_locked().
Following a recent auditing [1] of the callers of {,raw_}spin_is_locked(),
revealing that none of them are relying on the ordering guarantee anymore,
this commit removes the leading smp_mb() from the primitive thus reverting
38b850a73034f.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151981440005264&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152042843808540&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152043346110262&w=2
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akiyks@gmail.com
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luc.maranget@inria.fr
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: parri.andrea@gmail.com
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526338889-7003-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index ebdae15d665d..26c5bd7d88d8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -122,11 +122,6 @@ static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- /*
- * Ensure prior spin_lock operations to other locks have completed
- * on this CPU before we test whether "lock" is locked.
- */
- smp_mb(); /* ^^^ */
return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(READ_ONCE(*lock));
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-14 23:01 [PATCH memory-model 0/3] Kernel fixes to spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 23:01 ` [PATCH memory-model 1/3] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 6:25 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/spinlocks: " tip-bot for Andrea Parri
2018-05-14 23:01 ` [PATCH memory-model 2/3] arm64: Remove smp_mb() from arch_spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 6:26 ` tip-bot for Andrea Parri [this message]
2018-05-14 23:01 ` [PATCH memory-model 3/3] locking: Clean up comment and #ifndef for {,queued_}spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-15 6:26 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/spinlocks: " tip-bot for Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-c6f5d02b6a0fb91be5d656885ce02cf28952181d@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®