From: tip-bot for Dongsheng Yang <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Implement task_nice() as static inline function
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:32:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-d0ea026808ad81de2af14938448419a95211b938@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390878045-7096-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Commit-ID: d0ea026808ad81de2af14938448419a95211b938
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d0ea026808ad81de2af14938448419a95211b938
Author: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:00:45 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:28:23 +0100
sched: Implement task_nice() as static inline function
As patch "sched: Move the priority specific bits into a new header file" exposes
the priority related macros in linux/sched/prio.h, we don't have to implement
task_nice() in kernel/sched/core.c any more.
This patch implements it in linux/sched/sched.h as static inline function,
saving the kernel stack and enhancing performance a bit.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: clark.williams@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: raistlin@linux.it
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1390878045-7096-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 11 ++++++++++-
include/linux/sched/prio.h | 1 -
kernel/sched/core.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index d97d0a8..e3d5564 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2094,7 +2094,16 @@ static inline void sched_autogroup_exit(struct signal_struct *sig) { }
extern bool yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt);
extern void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice);
extern int task_prio(const struct task_struct *p);
-extern int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p);
+/**
+ * task_nice - return the nice value of a given task.
+ * @p: the task in question.
+ *
+ * Return: The nice value [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ].
+ */
+static inline int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return PRIO_TO_NICE((p)->static_prio);
+}
extern int can_nice(const struct task_struct *p, const int nice);
extern int task_curr(const struct task_struct *p);
extern int idle_cpu(int cpu);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/prio.h b/include/linux/sched/prio.h
index 13216f1..410ccb7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/prio.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/prio.h
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
*/
#define NICE_TO_PRIO(nice) (MAX_RT_PRIO + (nice) + 20)
#define PRIO_TO_NICE(prio) ((prio) - MAX_RT_PRIO - 20)
-#define TASK_NICE(p) PRIO_TO_NICE((p)->static_prio)
/*
* 'User priority' is the nice value converted to something we
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 210a12a..104c816 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3000,7 +3000,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
unsigned long flags;
struct rq *rq;
- if (TASK_NICE(p) == nice || nice < -20 || nice > 19)
+ if (task_nice(p) == nice || nice < -20 || nice > 19)
return;
/*
* We have to be careful, if called from sys_setpriority(),
@@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(nice, int, increment)
if (increment > 40)
increment = 40;
- nice = TASK_NICE(current) + increment;
+ nice = task_nice(current) + increment;
if (nice < -20)
nice = -20;
if (nice > 19)
@@ -3111,18 +3111,6 @@ int task_prio(const struct task_struct *p)
}
/**
- * task_nice - return the nice value of a given task.
- * @p: the task in question.
- *
- * Return: The nice value [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ].
- */
-int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return TASK_NICE(p);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_nice);
-
-/**
* idle_cpu - is a given cpu idle currently?
* @cpu: the processor in question.
*
@@ -3321,7 +3309,7 @@ recheck:
*/
if (user && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
if (fair_policy(policy)) {
- if (attr->sched_nice < TASK_NICE(p) &&
+ if (attr->sched_nice < task_nice(p) &&
!can_nice(p, attr->sched_nice))
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -3345,7 +3333,7 @@ recheck:
* SCHED_NORMAL if the RLIMIT_NICE would normally permit it.
*/
if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE && policy != SCHED_IDLE) {
- if (!can_nice(p, TASK_NICE(p)))
+ if (!can_nice(p, task_nice(p)))
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -3385,7 +3373,7 @@ recheck:
* If not changing anything there's no need to proceed further:
*/
if (unlikely(policy == p->policy)) {
- if (fair_policy(policy) && attr->sched_nice != TASK_NICE(p))
+ if (fair_policy(policy) && attr->sched_nice != task_nice(p))
goto change;
if (rt_policy(policy) && attr->sched_priority != p->rt_priority)
goto change;
@@ -3837,7 +3825,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
else if (task_has_rt_policy(p))
attr.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
else
- attr.sched_nice = TASK_NICE(p);
+ attr.sched_nice = task_nice(p);
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -7010,7 +6998,7 @@ void normalize_rt_tasks(void)
* Renice negative nice level userspace
* tasks back to 0:
*/
- if (TASK_NICE(p) < 0 && p->mm)
+ if (task_nice(p) < 0 && p->mm)
set_user_nice(p, 0);
continue;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 9994791..58624a6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ void account_user_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
p->utimescaled += cputime_scaled;
account_group_user_time(p, cputime);
- index = (TASK_NICE(p) > 0) ? CPUTIME_NICE : CPUTIME_USER;
+ index = (task_nice(p) > 0) ? CPUTIME_NICE : CPUTIME_USER;
/* Add user time to cpustat. */
task_group_account_field(p, index, (__force u64) cputime);
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
p->gtime += cputime;
/* Add guest time to cpustat. */
- if (TASK_NICE(p) > 0) {
+ if (task_nice(p) > 0) {
cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += (__force u64) cputime;
cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE] += (__force u64) cputime;
} else {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-22 22:41 [PATCH] tracing: Use task_nice() in function __update_max_tr() to get the nice value of task Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-23 3:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-23 4:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-23 17:11 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-23 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-23 11:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 22:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] sched: Collect the bits about priority into a new header file, include/linux/sched/prio.h Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <CA+qeAOqW58894hGvCP0N0E-EUESfFPeqMmXUuhqxEZrRjDV97A@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-28 16:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: Move the priority specific bits into a new header file Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-29 5:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:56 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-02-10 14:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-02-11 1:10 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-02-10 13:30 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-27 22:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: Expose some macros related with priority Dongsheng Yang
2014-02-10 13:30 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Expose some macros related to priority tip-bot for Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-27 22:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement task_nice and task_prio as static inline functions Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-27 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 1:09 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-27 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 1:59 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-27 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 3:00 ` [PATCH 3/3 V2] sched: Implement task_nice as static inline function Dongsheng Yang
2014-01-28 3:27 ` Dongsheng Yang
2014-02-10 13:32 ` tip-bot for Dongsheng Yang [this message]
2014-01-23 21:43 ` [PATCH] tracing: Use task_nice() in function __update_max_tr() to get the nice value of task Dongsheng Yang
2014-02-11 3:19 ` Dongsheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-d0ea026808ad81de2af14938448419a95211b938@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome