From: tip-bot for Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
stable@kernel.org, cpw@sgi.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
sivanich@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/uv: Fix uninitialized spinlocks
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:37:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-d2ebc71d472020bc30e29afe8c4d2a85a5b41f56@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RnXd1-0003wU-PM@eag09.americas.sgi.com>
Commit-ID: d2ebc71d472020bc30e29afe8c4d2a85a5b41f56
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d2ebc71d472020bc30e29afe8c4d2a85a5b41f56
Author: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:40:47 -0600
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:58:34 +0100
x86/uv: Fix uninitialized spinlocks
Initialize two spinlocks in tlb_uv.c and also properly define/initialize
the uv_irq_lock.
The lack of explicit initialization seems to be functionally
harmless, but it is diagnosed when these are turned on:
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/E1RnXd1-0003wU-PM@eag09.americas.sgi.com
[ Added the uv_irq_lock initialization fix by Dimitri Sivanich ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
index 9be4cff..3ae0e61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -1851,6 +1851,8 @@ static void __init init_per_cpu_tunables(void)
bcp->cong_reps = congested_reps;
bcp->cong_period = congested_period;
bcp->clocks_per_100_usec = usec_2_cycles(100);
+ spin_lock_init(&bcp->queue_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&bcp->uvhub_lock);
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
index 374a05d..f25c276 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct uv_irq_2_mmr_pnode{
int irq;
};
-static spinlock_t uv_irq_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uv_irq_lock);
static struct rb_root uv_irq_root;
static int uv_set_irq_affinity(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, bool);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-18 15:40 [PATCH] x86: uninitialized spinlocks in tlb_uv.c Cliff Wickman
2012-01-26 13:37 ` tip-bot for Cliff Wickman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-d2ebc71d472020bc30e29afe8c4d2a85a5b41f56@git.kernel.org \
--to=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome