From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754099AbbGaODo (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:03:44 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57569 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbbGaODl (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:03:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:02:45 -0700 From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski Message-ID: Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, dvlasenk@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, brgerst@gmail.com, luto@amacapital.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: dvlasenk@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, luto@amacapital.net, brgerst@gmail.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <502c8bef877b33fe4943885ded6125dfcc7892db.1438205722.git.luto@kernel.org> References: <502c8bef877b33fe4943885ded6125dfcc7892db.1438205722.git.luto@kernel.org> To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tip:x86/asm] selftests/x86/vm86: Fix entry_from_vm86 test on 64-bit kernels Git-Commit-ID: e800eb39e3f586e46a2007f72d3b609f6e3b888d X-Mailer: tip-git-log-daemon Robot-ID: Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact to get blacklisted from these emails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit-ID: e800eb39e3f586e46a2007f72d3b609f6e3b888d Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/e800eb39e3f586e46a2007f72d3b609f6e3b888d Author: Andy Lutomirski AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:35:43 -0700 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:31:07 +0200 selftests/x86/vm86: Fix entry_from_vm86 test on 64-bit kernels The test failed due to an oversight on my part when run on a 64-bit kernel. vm86 isn't expected to work at all, and I mistakenly failed one part of the test because no signal was delivered. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/502c8bef877b33fe4943885ded6125dfcc7892db.1438205722.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c index f004b2a..9a43a59 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[]; extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[], vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[]; -static void do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip, +/* Returns false if the test was skipped. */ +static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip, unsigned int rettype, unsigned int retarg, const char *text) { @@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ static void do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip, if (ret == -1 && errno == ENOSYS) { printf("[SKIP]\tvm86 not supported\n"); - return; + return false; } if (VM86_TYPE(ret) == VM86_INTx) { @@ -154,6 +155,8 @@ static void do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip, printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason\n"); nerrs++; } + + return true; } int main(void) @@ -219,8 +222,8 @@ int main(void) v86.regs.ss = 0; sethandler(SIGSEGV, sighandler, 0); got_signal = 0; - do_test(&v86, 0, VM86_SIGNAL, 0, "Execute null pointer"); - if (!got_signal) { + if (do_test(&v86, 0, VM86_SIGNAL, 0, "Execute null pointer") && + !got_signal) { printf("[FAIL]\tDid not receive SIGSEGV\n"); nerrs++; }