From: tip-bot for Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix load corruption from update_cfs_shares()
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:11:16 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-f0d7442a5924a802b66eef79b3708f77297bfb35@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101115234937.844900206@google.com>
Commit-ID: f0d7442a5924a802b66eef79b3708f77297bfb35
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f0d7442a5924a802b66eef79b3708f77297bfb35
Author: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:47:03 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:27:47 +0100
sched: Fix load corruption from update_cfs_shares()
As part of enqueue_entity both a new entity weight and its contribution to the
queuing cfs_rq / rq are updated. Since update_cfs_shares will only update the
queueing weights when the entity is on_rq (which in this case it is not yet),
there's a dependency loop here:
update_cfs_shares needs account_entity_enqueue to update cfs_rq->load.weight
account_entity_enqueue needs the updated weight for the queuing cfs_rq load[*]
Fix this and avoid spurious dequeue/enqueues by issuing update_cfs_shares as
if we had accounted the enqueue already.
This was also resulting in rq->load corruption previously.
[*]: this dependency also exists when using the group cfs_rq w/
update_cfs_shares as the weight of the enqueued entity changes
without the load being updated.
Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20101115234937.844900206@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 46ff658..d52b97a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
}
-static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long weight_delta)
{
struct task_group *tg;
struct sched_entity *se;
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
if (!se)
return;
- load = cfs_rq->load.weight;
+ load = cfs_rq->load.weight + weight_delta;
load_weight = atomic_read(&tg->load_weight);
load_weight -= cfs_rq->load_contribution;
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ static inline void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int lb)
{
}
-static inline void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static inline void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long weight_delta)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -881,8 +881,8 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
*/
update_curr(cfs_rq);
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
+ update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, se->load.weight);
account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
- update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) {
place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
- update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
/*
* Normalize the entity after updating the min_vruntime because the
@@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
- update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
}
hrtick_update(rq);
@@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
- update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
}
hrtick_update(rq);
@@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
* We need to update shares after updating tg->load_weight in
* order to adjust the weight of groups with long running tasks.
*/
- update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
+ update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-15 23:46 [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 00/11] reduce overhead for tg->shares distribution Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 01/11] sched: rewrite tg_shares_up Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Rewrite tg_shares_up) tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 02/11] sched: on-demand (active) cfs_rq list Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Implement " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 03/11] sched: make tg_shares_up() walk on-demand Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Make " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 04/11] sched: fix load corruption from update_cfs_shares Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:11 ` tip-bot for Paul Turner [this message]
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 05/11] sched: fix update_cfs_load synchronization Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:11 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix update_cfs_load() synchronization tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 06/11] sched: hierarchal order on shares update list Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:11 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Introduce " tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 07/11] sched: add sysctl_sched_shares_window Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Add sysctl_sched_shares_window tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 08/11] sched: update shares on idle_balance Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Update " tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 09/11] sched: demand based update_cfs_load() Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Implement " tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 10/11] sched: allow update_cfs_load to update global load Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:13 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Allow update_cfs_load() " tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-15 23:47 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write Paul Turner
2010-11-18 14:13 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Update " tip-bot for Paul Turner
2010-11-16 12:31 ` [tg_shares_up rewrite v4 00/11] reduce overhead for tg->shares distribution Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-f0d7442a5924a802b66eef79b3708f77297bfb35@git.kernel.org \
--to=pjt@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome