From: tip-bot for Viresh Kumar <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
rohit.k.jain@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
valentin.schneider@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() to optimize it
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 02:36:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-f1d88b4468188ddcd2620b8d612068faf6662a62@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20831b8d237bf3a20e4e328286f678b425ff04c9.1524738578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Commit-ID: f1d88b4468188ddcd2620b8d612068faf6662a62
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f1d88b4468188ddcd2620b8d612068faf6662a62
Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 16:00:50 +0530
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 4 May 2018 10:00:07 +0200
sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() to optimize it
Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() a bit to avoid executing some
conditional statements in few specific code-paths. That gets rid of the
goto as well.
This shouldn't result in any functional changes.
Tested-by: Rohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20831b8d237bf3a20e4e328286f678b425ff04c9.1524738578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e3002e5ada31..4b346f358005 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6613,7 +6613,7 @@ static int wake_cap(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int prev_cpu)
static int
select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
{
- struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
+ struct sched_domain *tmp, *sd = NULL;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
int new_cpu = prev_cpu;
int want_affine = 0;
@@ -6636,7 +6636,10 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
*/
if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) &&
cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
- affine_sd = tmp;
+ if (cpu != prev_cpu)
+ new_cpu = wake_affine(tmp, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sync);
+
+ sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */
break;
}
@@ -6646,33 +6649,25 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
break;
}
- if (affine_sd) {
- sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */
- if (cpu == prev_cpu)
- goto pick_cpu;
-
- new_cpu = wake_affine(affine_sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sync);
- }
+ if (unlikely(sd)) {
+ /* Slow path */
- if (sd && !(sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_FORK)) {
/*
* We're going to need the task's util for capacity_spare_wake
* in find_idlest_group. Sync it up to prev_cpu's
* last_update_time.
*/
- sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
- }
-
- if (!sd) {
-pick_cpu:
- if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) { /* XXX always ? */
- new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
+ if (!(sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_FORK))
+ sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
- if (want_affine)
- current->recent_used_cpu = cpu;
- }
- } else {
new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sd_flag);
+ } else if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) { /* XXX always ? */
+ /* Fast path */
+
+ new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
+
+ if (want_affine)
+ current->recent_used_cpu = cpu;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-04 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 10:30 [PATCH V2 1/2] " Viresh Kumar
2018-04-26 10:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Avoid calling sync_entity_load_avg() unnecessarily Viresh Kumar
2018-04-27 8:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-27 9:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-27 11:25 ` Quentin Perret
2018-05-04 9:37 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2018-04-26 14:35 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] sched/fair: Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() to optimize it Valentin Schneider
2018-05-04 9:36 ` tip-bot for Viresh Kumar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-f1d88b4468188ddcd2620b8d612068faf6662a62@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rohit.k.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®