From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 1
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:24:45 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-f96e9232e04856c781d4f71923a46dd3f7b429fa@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12626465501455-git-send-email->
Commit-ID: f96e9232e04856c781d4f71923a46dd3f7b429fa
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f96e9232e04856c781d4f71923a46dd3f7b429fa
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:09:00 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:06:01 +0100
rcu: Adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 1
This causes rnp->lock to be held on entry to
force_quiescent_state()'s switch statement. This is a first
step towards prohibiting starting grace periods while
force_quiescent_state() is executing, which will reduce the
number and complexity of races that force_quiescent_state() is
involved in.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <12626465501455-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 53ae959..eae331d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
}
if (relaxed &&
(long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies) >= 0)
- goto unlock_ret; /* no emergency and done recently. */
+ goto unlock_fqs_ret; /* no emergency and done recently. */
rsp->n_force_qs++;
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
lastcomp = rsp->gpnum - 1;
@@ -1213,31 +1213,32 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
if(!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
rsp->n_force_qs_ngp++;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
- goto unlock_ret; /* no GP in progress, time updated. */
+ goto unlock_fqs_ret; /* no GP in progress, time updated. */
}
- spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
switch (signaled) {
case RCU_GP_IDLE:
case RCU_GP_INIT:
+ spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
break; /* grace period idle or initializing, ignore. */
case RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK:
+ spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT != RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
break; /* So gcc recognizes the dead code. */
/* Record dyntick-idle state. */
if (rcu_process_dyntick(rsp, lastcomp,
dyntick_save_progress_counter))
- goto unlock_ret;
+ goto unlock_fqs_ret;
+ spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
/* fall into next case. */
case RCU_SAVE_COMPLETED:
/* Update state, record completion counter. */
forcenow = 0;
- spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
if (lastcomp + 1 == rsp->gpnum &&
lastcomp == rsp->completed &&
rsp->signaled == signaled) {
@@ -1245,23 +1246,31 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
rsp->completed_fqs = lastcomp;
forcenow = signaled == RCU_SAVE_COMPLETED;
}
- spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
- if (!forcenow)
+ if (!forcenow) {
+ spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
break;
+ }
/* fall into next case. */
case RCU_FORCE_QS:
/* Check dyntick-idle state, send IPI to laggarts. */
+ spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
if (rcu_process_dyntick(rsp, rsp->completed_fqs,
rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs))
- goto unlock_ret;
+ goto unlock_fqs_ret;
/* Leave state in case more forcing is required. */
break;
+
+ default:
+
+ spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ break;
}
-unlock_ret:
+unlock_fqs_ret:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->fqslock, flags);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-04 23:08 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/11] rcu: suppress GP start to simplify force_quiescent_state() Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu: adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 1 Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:24 ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu: adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 2 Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:25 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Adjust " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu: prohibit starting new grace periods while forcing quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:25 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Prohibit " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcu: eliminate local variable signaled from force_quiescent_state() Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:25 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Eliminate " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: eliminate local variable lastcomp " Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:25 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Eliminate " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/11] rcu: eliminate second argument of rcu_process_dyntick() Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:26 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Eliminate " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu: eliminate rcu_process_dyntick() return value Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:26 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Eliminate " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: remove leg of force_quiescent_state() switch statement Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:26 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Remove " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu: remove redundant grace-period check Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:26 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Remove " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu: make force_quiescent_state() start grace period if needed Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:27 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Make " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-04 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: add force_quiescent_state() testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-13 10:27 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Add " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-f96e9232e04856c781d4f71923a46dd3f7b429fa@git.kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome