From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/x86: Rewrite set_cpu_sibling_map()
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 06:44:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-klcwahu3gx467uhfiqjyhdcs@git.kernel.org> (raw)
Commit-ID: 316ad248307fba13be40f01e92a22b89457c32bc
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/316ad248307fba13be40f01e92a22b89457c32bc
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
AuthorDate: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:05:59 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:05:25 +0200
sched/x86: Rewrite set_cpu_sibling_map()
Commit ad7687dde ("x86/numa: Check for nonsensical topologies on real
hw as well") is broken in that the condition can trigger for valid
setups but only changes the end result for invalid setups with no real
means of discerning between those.
Rewrite set_cpu_sibling_map() to make the code clearer and make sure
to only warn when the check changes the end result.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-klcwahu3gx467uhfiqjyhdcs@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 7c53d96..e84c1bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -315,70 +315,90 @@ void __cpuinit smp_store_cpu_info(int id)
identify_secondary_cpu(c);
}
-static void __cpuinit link_thread_siblings(int cpu1, int cpu2)
+static bool __cpuinit
+topology_sane(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o, const char *name)
{
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu1, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu2));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu1));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu1, cpu_core_mask(cpu2));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, cpu_core_mask(cpu1));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu1, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu2));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu1));
+ int cpu1 = c->cpu_index, cpu2 = o->cpu_index;
+
+ return !WARN_ONCE(cpu_to_node(cpu1) != cpu_to_node(cpu2),
+ "sched: CPU #%d's %s-sibling CPU #%d is not on the same node! "
+ "[node: %d != %d]. Ignoring dependency.\n",
+ cpu1, name, cpu2, cpu_to_node(cpu1), cpu_to_node(cpu2));
}
+#define link_mask(_m, c1, c2) \
+do { \
+ cpumask_set_cpu((c1), cpu_##_m##_mask(c2)); \
+ cpumask_set_cpu((c2), cpu_##_m##_mask(c1)); \
+} while (0)
-void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
+static bool __cpuinit match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
{
- int i;
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+ int cpu1 = c->cpu_index, cpu2 = o->cpu_index;
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_setup_mask);
+ if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu2) &&
+ c->compute_unit_id == o->compute_unit_id)
+ return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
- if (smp_num_siblings > 1) {
- for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_setup_mask) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *o = &cpu_data(i);
+ } else if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
+ c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id) {
+ return topology_sane(c, o, "smt");
+ }
- if (cpu_to_node(cpu) != cpu_to_node(i)) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "sched: CPU #%d's thread-sibling CPU #%d not on the same node! [node %d != %d]. Ignoring sibling dependency.\n", cpu, i, cpu_to_node(cpu), cpu_to_node(i));
- continue;
- }
+ return false;
+}
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
- if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, i) &&
- c->compute_unit_id == o->compute_unit_id)
- link_thread_siblings(cpu, i);
- } else if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id &&
- c->cpu_core_id == o->cpu_core_id) {
- link_thread_siblings(cpu, i);
- }
- }
- } else {
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
- }
+static bool __cpuinit match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
+{
+ int cpu1 = c->cpu_index, cpu2 = o->cpu_index;
+
+ if (per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) != BAD_APICID &&
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu1) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu2))
+ return topology_sane(c, o, "llc");
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool __cpuinit match_mc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
+{
+ if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id)
+ return topology_sane(c, o, "mc");
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
+{
+ bool has_mc = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores > 1;
+ bool has_smt = smp_num_siblings > 1;
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *o;
+ int i;
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_setup_mask);
- if (__this_cpu_read(cpu_info.x86_max_cores) == 1) {
- cpumask_copy(cpu_core_mask(cpu), cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
+ if (!has_smt && !has_mc) {
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
c->booted_cores = 1;
return;
}
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_setup_mask) {
- if (cpu_to_node(cpu) != cpu_to_node(i)) {
- WARN_ONCE(1, "sched: CPU #%d's core-sibling CPU #%d not on the same node! [node %d != %d]. Ignoring sibling dependency.\n", cpu, i, cpu_to_node(cpu), cpu_to_node(i));
- continue;
- }
+ o = &cpu_data(i);
- if (per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) != BAD_APICID &&
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, i)) {
- cpumask_set_cpu(i, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(i));
- }
+ if ((i == cpu) || (has_smt && match_smt(c, o)))
+ link_mask(sibling, cpu, i);
+
+ if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_llc(c, o)))
+ link_mask(llc_shared, cpu, i);
+
+ if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_mc(c, o))) {
+ link_mask(core, cpu, i);
- if (c->phys_proc_id == cpu_data(i).phys_proc_id) {
- cpumask_set_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(i));
/*
* Does this new cpu bringup a new core?
*/
reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-klcwahu3gx467uhfiqjyhdcs@git.kernel.org \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome