From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, damien_benoist@yahoo.com,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Subject: [patch 1/3] ieee1394: regression in 2.6.25: updates should happen before probes
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:36:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tkrat.bdb066b22ec930a0@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A6BA6F.2030000@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Regression since commit 73cf60232ef16e1f8a64defa97214a1722db1e6c,
"ieee1394: use class iteration api": The two loops for (1.) driver
updates and (2.) driver probes were replaced by a single loop with
bogus needs_probe checks. Hence updates and probes were now intermixed,
and especially sbp2 updates (reconnects) held up longer than necessary.
While we fix it, change the needs_probe flag to bool type for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
---
I will make sure that this goes into -stable too.
Dave, I won't Cc you on patch 2/3 and 3/3 of this series because they
are not related to the loop regression.
drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c | 14 ++++++++------
drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
+++ linux/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static struct node_entry *nodemgr_create
ne->host = host;
ne->nodeid = nodeid;
ne->generation = generation;
- ne->needs_probe = 1;
+ ne->needs_probe = true;
ne->guid = guid;
ne->guid_vendor_id = (guid >> 40) & 0xffffff;
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static void nodemgr_process_root_directo
struct csr1212_keyval *kv, *vendor_name_kv = NULL;
u8 last_key_id = 0;
- ne->needs_probe = 0;
+ ne->needs_probe = false;
csr1212_for_each_dir_entry(ne->csr, kv, ne->csr->root_kv, dentry) {
switch (kv->key.id) {
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static void nodemgr_update_node(struct n
nodemgr_update_bus_options(ne);
/* Mark the node as new, so it gets re-probed */
- ne->needs_probe = 1;
+ ne->needs_probe = true;
} else {
/* old cache is valid, so update its generation */
struct nodemgr_csr_info *ci = ne->csr->private;
@@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ static void nodemgr_probe_ne(struct host
struct probe_param {
struct host_info *hi;
int generation;
+ bool probe_now;
};
static int __nodemgr_node_probe(struct device *dev, void *data)
@@ -1568,9 +1569,7 @@ static int __nodemgr_node_probe(struct d
struct node_entry *ne;
ne = container_of(dev, struct node_entry, node_dev);
- if (!ne->needs_probe)
- nodemgr_probe_ne(param->hi, ne, param->generation);
- if (ne->needs_probe)
+ if (ne->needs_probe == param->probe_now)
nodemgr_probe_ne(param->hi, ne, param->generation);
return 0;
}
@@ -1591,6 +1590,9 @@ static void nodemgr_node_probe(struct ho
* while probes are time-consuming. (Well, those probes need some
* improvement...) */
+ param.probe_now = false;
+ class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, ¶m, __nodemgr_node_probe);
+ param.probe_now = true;
class_for_each_device(&nodemgr_ne_class, ¶m, __nodemgr_node_probe);
/* If we had a bus reset while we were scanning the bus, it is
Index: linux/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.h
+++ linux/drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ struct node_entry {
struct hpsb_host *host; /* Host this node is attached to */
nodeid_t nodeid; /* NodeID */
struct bus_options busopt; /* Bus Options */
- int needs_probe;
+ bool needs_probe;
unsigned int generation; /* Synced with hpsb generation */
/* The following is read from the config rom */
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-16 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <994096.81924.qm@web50505.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
[not found] ` <48A5A80A.90506@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <48A6BA6F.2030000@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
2008-08-16 11:36 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-08-16 11:38 ` [patch 2/3] ieee1394: don't drop nodes during bus reset series Stefan Richter
2008-08-16 11:39 ` [patch 3/3] ieee1394: sbp2: let nodemgr retry node updates " Stefan Richter
2008-08-19 19:28 ` [patch 2/3] ieee1394: don't drop nodes " Stefan Richter
2008-08-19 19:29 ` [patch 1/2] ieee1394: nodemgr clean up class iterators Stefan Richter
2008-08-19 19:30 ` [patch 2/2] ieee1394: survive a few seconds connection loss Stefan Richter
2008-10-10 17:13 ` [patch amendment] " Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tkrat.bdb066b22ec930a0@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=damien_benoist@yahoo.com \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®