From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262186AbTLSJlM (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:41:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262190AbTLSJlM (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:41:12 -0500 Received: from head.linpro.no ([80.232.36.1]:11711 "EHLO head.linpro.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262186AbTLSJlI (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 04:41:08 -0500 To: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM-related (?) oops in 2.4.22 + rmap15k References: From: Sigurd Urdahl Organization: Linpro AS Date: 19 Dec 2003 10:40:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1AXH7w-0005Bb-60*K9d/C84oHA2* Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sigurd Urdahl writes: > I believe that the kernel is also patched with ACL's and a few other > things, but as far as I can gather none of the extra patches should > impact on the VM. (The guy who patched together the kernel is away on > holiday) I have some additional info on the applied patchset. The kernel started out as a 2.4.22 and has the following applied: 01_-_patch-2.4.22-1000-ckbase-0309132043 02_-_patch-2422-ck2base-rmap15k-0309210033 03_-_ea+acl+nfsacl-2.4.22-0.8.64.diff-rmap-compatfixes 05_-_linux-2.4.21-ipvs-1.0.10.patch 06_-_linux-2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch-fixed 07_-_linux-2.4.19-fw-tulip-mtu.patch 08_-_eepro-vlan-mtu-patch2 09_-_online-ext3-2.4.19.diff+EA+ACL-compatfixes 10_-_ebtables-brnf-2_vs_2.4.22.diff 11_-_rmapfix 12_-_patch-2.4.22-ck2-fix.patch 13_-_rmapfix_from_rik 14_-_do_brk_bounds_check (for reference, our local maintainer is Tore Andersson) -sig -- Sigurd Urdahl sigurdur@linpro.no Systemkonsulent og sånt Systems consultant and such Linpro A/S http://www.linpro.no/