From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932222Ab0EDSRI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 4 May 2010 14:17:08 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com ([209.85.218.225]:60616 "EHLO
	mail-bw0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1759796Ab0EDSRG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 4 May 2010 14:17:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100504174507.GI30601@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <k2ncecb6d8f1004191627w3cd36450xf797f746460abb09@mail.gmail.com> 
	<20100420155122.6f2c26eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100420230719.GB1432@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> 
	<n2gcecb6d8f1005041035w51dac3c8ke829a4ae8bf7f408@mail.gmail.com> 
	<20100504174507.GI30601@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
From: Marcelo Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 15:16:40 -0300
Message-ID: <v2gcecb6d8f1005041116wc521061jba732b6a10b0b3e7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Suspicious compilation warning
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
       Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
       Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
       KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:45, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> What should be asked is whether it has been tested - if not, can we find
> someone who can test and validate the change?

I can test it, but I need help to figure out the test itself. I am
porting the kernel 2.6 to nanoengine and my resources in that
environment are still rather limited, not to mention I have not
finished the PCI port, so I still have no network.

On the other hand, the current situation is clearly broken and your
solution can hardly be worse than having NR_SECTION_ROOTS == 0.

Regards,
Marcelo.