From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261162AbVFCXK5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:10:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261169AbVFCXK5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:10:57 -0400 Received: from relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au ([203.220.32.149]:49085 "EHLO relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261162AbVFCXKy (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:10:54 -0400 From: Grant Coady To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linux Kernel , stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: Stable 2.6.x.y kernel series... Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:10:51 +1000 Organization: Message-ID: References: <42A0DD2F.5060602@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <42A0DD2F.5060602@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:43:59 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >(because it's Friday, the time to yammer about such things...) > > >Just wanted to say in public that I think the stable 2.6.x.y kernel >series is working out quite well. Kudos to the stable@kernel.org team >for a job well done. > >The 2.6.x.y series is definitely filling a needed niche. For slackware users too (no distro kernel fixes), this is first time I switch a couple boxen to 2.6 series full time. Compared to running the late 2.3.99 - early 2.4 years ago (on redhat6.2) where one switched between main or -ac depending on current stability :) Back when Jeff fiddling with tulips? --Grant.