From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:23:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:23:26 -0400 Received: from sta18.netwrx1.com ([156.46.225.18]:11501 "EHLO eagle.netwrx1.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:23:25 -0400 From: "George R. Kasica" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.10 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:23:50 -0500 Organization: Netwrx Consulting Inc. Reply-To: georgek@netwrx1.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanner: exiscan *15md0w-0000SJ-00*z/cnTUwok92* http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm currently running 2.4.5 here and I'm considering 2.4.10 but am somewhat more nervous about this release than others based on the number of reports of problems I'm seeing... What would be the advice of others in terms of moving up from 2.4.5 which has been rock solid here? Would you recommend doing the upgrade or waiting for 2.4.11 or is there a middle ground release (2.4.6,7,8,9) that you'd recommend. George ===[George R. Kasica]=== +1 262 677 0766 President +1 206 374 6482 FAX Netwrx Consulting Inc. Jackson, WI USA http://www.netwrx1.com georgek@netwrx1.com ICQ #12862186