From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Xia Yan <yanxia@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
yana06070@163.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, willemb@google.com,
tpluszz77@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] ipv6: fix cached route reuse for SO_MARK control messages
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 22:01:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1e8c4e152eca9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106021245.246267-1-yanxia@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Xia Yan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the review. v2 fixes SO_MARK sends, including the concurrent
> sk_mark case that came up during the v1 review. Sends without an SO_MARK
> cmsg keep the current behavior.
>
> Willem, you also raised the flowlabel and dscp cases in the v1 review:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/willemdebruijn.kernel.6ba984cf38a@gmail.com/
>
> I'd like to keep the SO_MARK fix targeted at net and handle the
> remaining cache issues separately in net-next. Does that split make
> sense to you?
Agreed that those additional concerns should not block this patch.
Are they net-next material, or similar bugs and thus also net?
> I'll wait for your feedback on the scope before posting v3.
>
> v3 will also add a fwmark 0/0xffffffff prohibit rule to the
> connected-socket selftest, so reusing the cached route instead of doing
> a fresh lookup fails the explicit-zero cases.
>
> Thanks,
> Xia Yan
>
> pw-bot: cr
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 9:22 Xia Yan
2026-11-04 9:22 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: net: exercise SO_MARK on connected sockets Xia Yan
2026-11-04 9:23 ` Xia Yan
2026-11-05 9:39 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-04 9:23 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] ipv6: fix cached route reuse for SO_MARK control messages Xia Yan
2026-11-04 9:29 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-04 9:50 ` Xia Yan
2026-11-05 9:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-06 2:13 ` Xia Yan
2026-11-06 3:01 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-11-06 3:14 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.1e8c4e152eca9@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tpluszz77@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yana06070@163.com \
--cc=yanxia@cmss.chinamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®