From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Kalpesh Solanki <skalpesh942@gmail.com>,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
alex.aring@gmail.com, stefan@datenfreihafen.org,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Kalpesh Solanki <skalpesh942@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] tun: disallow setting IEEE 802.15.4 and 6LoWPAN link types via TUNSETLINK
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 11:21:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.4bc56403b78e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109083037.22337-1-skalpesh942@gmail.com>
Kalpesh Solanki wrote:
> A userspace application can set the link type of a TUN/TAP interface
> to ARPHRD_IEEE802154, ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR, or ARPHRD_6LOWPAN
> via ioctl(fd, TUNSETLINK, arg) because tun_get_addr_len() explicitly
> recognized these types.
>
> However, TUN devices cannot function as genuine IEEE 802.15.4 or 6LoWPAN
> interfaces:
>
> 1. They lack wpan_phy, channels, PAN IDs, and MLME operations, and tun
> never initializes dev->ieee802154_ptr or dev->ml_priv. When an
> unprivileged user creates a TUN interface in a user+net namespace,
> changes its link type to ARPHRD_IEEE802154, and issues a netlink dump
> request (such as IEEE802154_LLSEC_LIST_KEY),
> ieee802154_llsec_dump_table() unconditionally dereferences
> dev->ieee802154_ptr / ieee802154_mlme_ops(dev), triggering a supervisor
> null-pointer dereference / general protection fault. Similar
> dereferences occur across net/ieee802154/nl-phy.c (ieee802154_del_iface)
> and net/ieee802154/socket.c.
>
> 2. Similarly, the 6LoWPAN subsystem assumes via lowpan_dev(dev) that
> netdev_priv(dev) is struct lowpan_dev. On a TUN device, netdev_priv(dev)
> is struct tun_struct. On netdev events (such as NETDEV_DOWN in
> net/6lowpan/core.c:lowpan_device_event), it clears bits in
> lowpan_dev(dev)->ctx.table flags, which corrupts private memory inside
> tun_struct.
>
> Rather than scattering checks across subsystems, fix the issue at the
> source: disallow setting ARPHRD_IEEE802154, ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR, and
> ARPHRD_6LOWPAN via TUNSETLINK by returning -EINVAL. Cast arg to unsigned
> short in the comparison to prevent upper-bit truncation bypasses (e.g.
> arg = ARPHRD_IEEE802154 | 0x10000).
>
> Fixes: ff4cc3ac93e1 ("[TUNTAP]: Allow setting the linktype of the tap device from userspace")
> Reported-by: syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9ea34da5ca6100593c90
> Signed-off-by: Kalpesh Solanki <skalpesh942@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
This may affect more protocols, and sashiko may surface that.
That can always be a separate follow-up.
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index dcec7311e60..b50a7245be9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -3362,6 +3362,10 @@ static long __tun_chr_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> netif_info(tun, drv, tun->dev,
> "Linktype set failed because interface is up\n");
> ret = -EBUSY;
> + } else if ((unsigned short)arg == ARPHRD_IEEE802154 ||
> + (unsigned short)arg == ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR ||
> + (unsigned short)arg == ARPHRD_6LOWPAN) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> } else {
> ret = call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_PRE_TYPE_CHANGE,
> tun->dev);
> --
> 2.53.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 8:30 Kalpesh Solanki
2026-11-09 16:21 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.4bc56403b78e@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=skalpesh942@gmail.com \
--cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
--cc=syzbot+9ea34da5ca6100593c90@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®