mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/code-patching: Flush the patch area TLB entry locally
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 14:42:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <wlqu5lej.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44406eef-0035-4d6f-a2b0-3647d7c1ea2e@kernel.org>

"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org> writes:

> Le 03/11/2026 à 03:54, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) a écrit :
>> patching functions like patch_mem() and patch_instructions(), maps the
>> target page at the per-cpu text_poke_area, write it, clear the PTE and
>> then flushes the tlb using flush_tlb_kernel_range(), with interrupts
>> disabled. flush_tlb_kernel_range() on SMP nohash (e500) does an IPI
>> based TLB invalidation i.e -
>> 
>> 	smp_call_function(do_flush_tlb_mm_ipi, NULL, 1);
>> 
>> ...which will wait for other CPUs but with interrupts off. This can be
>> caught by lockdep with the following warning:
>> 
>>    WARNING: kernel/smp.c:917 at smp_call_function_many_cond+0x430/0x818, CPU#1: swapper/0/1
>>    CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc1-leds-v4 #1 PREEMPT
>>    Hardware name: Turris 1.1 e500v2 0x80211051 Freescale P2020
>>    Call Trace:
>>    [c1915bc0] [c001be04] flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x2c/0x74
>>    [c1915bd0] [c001ce2c] patch_instructions+0x1b0/0x318
>>    [c1915c20] [c003113c] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x5c/0xb4
>>    [c1915c40] [c01c3398] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x28/0x8c
>>    [c1915c60] [c0031770] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x5dc/0x758
>>    ...
>>    [c1915dd0] [c102e114] ptp_classifier_init+0x30/0x4c
>>    [c1915df0] [c102d3a8] sock_init+0xc8/0xe4
>>    ...
>>    hardirqs last disabled at (3076): [<c001ceb4>] patch_instructions+0x238/0x318
>> 
>> Josef confirmed that this was causing a hang (deadlock):
>>      I think this is why the CZ.NIC Turris 1.1 hangs early in boot with
>>      CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y. On 6.18.44 it hung in 19 of 19 boots and booted
>>      fine 9 of 9 times with jump labels off. The hang comes while static
>>      keys are patched and modules are loaded, nothing is printed and the
>>      watchdog resets the board. OpenWrt keeps jump labels off on these
>>      boards for now.
>> 
>> ...which is possible if both cpus are doing similar operations with interrupts
>> off and doing TLB invalidation using IPI.
>> 
>> Broadcast TLB invalidation is not needed here since text_poke_area is
>> a per-cpu area. It is mapped and unmapped with interrupts disabled by
>> it's own cpu. The only reason I think, if we would need a broadcast tlb
>> invalidate is, when we want to prevent a stray or malicious write to
>> this cpu text_poke_area by another CPU. This generally gets solved with
>> temporary-mm path like how Radix and even x86 implements. However, booke
>> doesn't implement that, so for now let's ensure we use local tlb
>> flushing for correctness.
>
> This problem was already discussed one year ago, see 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/PA3P192MB2865C07D634E3B775D003C7F8CD7A@PA3P192MB2865.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
>
> See response from Arnd, a stop_machine() should be done for completeness.
>

I will have to take sometime to go over what ARM does here with
stop_machine(). However, either ways I think, we still need this fix,
since otherwise P2020 boards gets hung during boot. Thoughts?


>> 
>> Fixes: 49e3d8ea6248 ("powerpc/fsl_booke: Enable STRICT_KERNEL_RWX")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261026195644.16384-1-pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com/
>> Tested-by: Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>> index 44ff9f684bef..6351342fa5c3 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>> @@ -276,6 +276,23 @@ static int __do_patch_mem_mm(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword)
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> 
>> +/*
>> + * The patch area is per-CPU and only used by its own CPU, with IRQs
>> + * disabled, so only the local TLB can hold an entry for it.
>> + *
>> + * On nohash SMP, flush_tlb_kernel_range() IPIs the other CPUs and waits, which
>> + * must not be done with IRQs disabled (see smp_call_function_many_cond()), so
>> + * flush just the local kernel (PID 0) entry.
>> + * Book3S keeps flush_tlb_kernel_range() which doesn't IPI here.
>> + */
>> +static void flush_patch_area(unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S))
>
> CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S not consistant with commit message. Are you adressing 
> a problem on e500 only ? on all not book3s ? What about book3s/32 ? What 
> about 8xx ? Even for book3s/64, is it correct at all when 
> mm_patch_enabled() returns false ?
>

No we are addressing the problem on all NOHASH platforms. IIUC, all
!BOOK3S are "nohash". Although some of them maybe UP, so it doesn't
matter whether a flush_tlb_kernel_range() is called or
local_flush_tlb_page() - it wouldn't matter. And on others which are SMP
but do not have STRICT_KERNEL_RWX enabled, they will anyway not go
through this path - but if they ever do - then we should ensure they too
do a local_flush_tlb_range() to avoid the same deadlock.

However, I think, maybe we could use CONFIG_PPC_MMU_NOHASH instead of using
CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S, thoughts?


-ritesh

>> +		flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	else
>> +		local_flush_tlb_page(NULL, addr);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __do_patch_mem(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword)
>>   {
>>   	int err;
>> @@ -296,7 +313,7 @@ static int __do_patch_mem(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword)
>>   	err = __patch_mem(addr, val, patch_addr, is_dword);
>> 
>>   	pte_clear(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte);
>> -	flush_tlb_kernel_range(text_poke_addr, text_poke_addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	flush_patch_area(text_poke_addr);
>> 
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> @@ -488,7 +505,7 @@ static int __do_patch_instructions(u32 *addr, u32 *code, size_t len, bool repeat
>>   	err = __patch_instructions(patch_addr, code, len, repeat_instr);
>> 
>>   	pte_clear(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte);
>> -	flush_tlb_kernel_range(text_poke_addr, text_poke_addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	flush_patch_area(text_poke_addr);
>> 
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>> 

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03  2:54 Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-11-03  7:33 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-11-03  9:12   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=wlqu5lej.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®