From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756372AbbJ1VCc (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:02:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38226 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756332AbbJ1VC3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:02:29 -0400 From: Jeff Moyer To: "Williams\, Dan J" Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm\@ml01.01.org" , "hch\@lst.de" , "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" , "axboe\@fb.com" , "jack\@suse.com" , "david\@fromorbit.com" , "jack\@suse.cz" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations References: <20151022171015.38343.72043.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20151022171026.38343.6371.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <1445554654.17208.14.camel@intel.com> X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4 X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD 5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4 X-PCLoadLetter: What the f**k does that mean? Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:02:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1445554654.17208.14.camel@intel.com> (Dan J. Williams's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2015 22:57:37 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Williams, Dan J" writes: > The problem is that intervening call to cond_resched(). I later want to > inject an rcu_read_lock()/unlock() pair to allow flushing active > dax_map_atomic() usages at driver teardown time [1]. But, I think the > patch stands alone as a cleanup outside of that admittedly hidden > motivation. I'm not going to split hairs. Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer