From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752568AbZJ0ROp@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752568AbZJ0ROp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:14:45 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751360AbZJ0ROo
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:14:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6366 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751330AbZJ0ROo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:14:44 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cfq-iosched: reimplement priorities using different service trees
References: <200910262244.51965.czoccolo@gmail.com>
	<200910271009.08776.czoccolo@gmail.com>
X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4
X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD  5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4
X-PCLoadLetter: What the f**k does that mean?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:14:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200910271009.08776.czoccolo@gmail.com> (Corrado Zoccolo's
	message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:09:08 +0100")
Message-ID: <x4963a021z0.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com> writes:

> Resent to fix one regression in close cooperator code.

This seems to be damaged (or my mailer sucks).  Can you send it again,
please?  The other patches apply just fine.

Cheers,
Jeff