From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758356Ab2FZPbJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:31:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3793 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757161Ab2FZPbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:31:07 -0400 From: Jeff Moyer To: Josh Boyer Cc: Jens Axboe , Nick Piggin , LKML List , torsten.hilbrich@secunet.com, Richard Jones , stable@vger.kernel.org, Marcos Mello Subject: Re: [patch] block: fix infinite loop in __getblk_slow References: X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4 X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD 5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4 X-PCLoadLetter: What the f**k does that mean? Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:31:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Josh Boyer's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:27:50 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Josh Boyer writes: > Is this needed in addition to your earlier patch here: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1316228 > > or is it a replacement for that? Sorry for the confusion, it's a replacement for that patch. Cheers, Jeff