mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Doug Neal <dneallkml@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I/O scheduler deadlocks on Xen virtual block devices
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:33:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49fwxtqsh8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=O6Tpiz8TRFFknEpW7MMTGBAtqCpr7zH3abO67@mail.gmail.com> (Doug Neal's message of "Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:17:25 +0100")

Doug Neal <dneallkml@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello all,
>
> I believe I have found a bug in the I/O scheduler which results in
> access to a block device being blocked indefinitely.
>
> The setup:
>  * Xen dom0 version 3.4.2.
>  * domU: Ubuntu 10.04, x86_64, with kernel 2.6.32.15+drm33.5.
>  * Paravirtual disks and network interfaces.
>  * Root filesystem on /dev/xvdb1
>  * A scratch filesystem for the purposes of my tests on /dev/xvda
> mounted on /mnt
>  * Both filesystems are ext3, formatted and mounted with defaults
>  * XVBDs are backed by LVM on top of an iSCSI SAN in the dom0.
>
>
> Activities leading up to the incident:
>
> To reproduce the bug, I run the VM on a Xen host which has a moderate
> workload of other VMs. (It seems to manifest itself more readily than
> if the host is otherwise idle).
>
> I repeatedly rsync the contents of a Linux install CD to an arbitrary
> location on the scratch filesystem, e.g. /mnt/test, then rm -rf the
> lot, and rsync again. It can sometimes take a few iterations before
> the bug is triggered. Sometimes it's triggered on the rsync, sometimes
> on the rm.
>
> At some point during either the rsync or the rm, all the processes
> accessing /dev/xvda (rsync, kjournald, flush) become stuck in the D
> state. After 120 seconds the warnings start to appear in dmesg:
>
>   [  840.070508] INFO: task rm:1455 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>   [  840.070514] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
> disables this message.
>
> Full dmesg output is below, including call traces which show that each
> of these processes is stuck in io_schedule or sync_buffer called from
> io_schedule.
>
>
> I believe I have eliminated:
>  * Problems with the underlying physical device
>    - The same bug has manifested itself on two completely separate
> sets of hardware, with different servers, switches, and SANs.
>
>  * Problems with the host's iSCSI initiator
>    - Other VMs depending on the same iSCSI session are unaffected
>    - Other XVBDs within the same VM (in this case: /dev/xvdb1 mounted
> on /) are unaffected
>
> Things I've tried:
>  * Noop, deadline, cfq and anticipatory elevators.

Did you try these different I/O schedulers in the domU or on the dom0?
Does switching I/O schedulers in either place make the problem go away
when it happens?

Cheers,
Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-01 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-01 14:17 Doug Neal
2010-09-01 17:33 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2010-09-02  8:34   ` Doug Neal
2010-09-02 13:47     ` Jeff Moyer
2010-09-02 14:06       ` Doug Neal
2010-09-02 15:25         ` Jeff Moyer
2010-09-02 15:43           ` Doug Neal
2010-09-03 12:22 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-09-03 15:17   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-09-06 12:44     ` Doug Neal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49fwxtqsh8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dneallkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®