mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: 2.6.30-rc deadline scheduler performance regression for iozone over NFS
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:01:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49hc0f79k9.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

I've been working on CFQ improvements for interleaved I/Os between
processes, and noticed a regression in performance when using the
deadline I/O scheduler.  The test uses a server configured with a cciss
array and 1Gb/s ethernet.

The iozone command line was:
  iozone -s 2000000 -r 64 -f /mnt/test/testfile -i 1 -w

The numbers in the nfsd's row represent the number of nfsd "threads".
These numbers (in MB/s) represent the average of 5 runs.

               v2.6.29

nfsd's  |   1    |  2   |   4   |   8
--------+---------------+-------+------
deadline| 43207 | 67436 | 96289 | 107590

              2.6.30-rc1

nfsd's  |   1   |   2   |   4   |   8
--------+---------------+-------+------
deadline| 43732 | 68059 | 76659 | 83231

    2.6.30-rc3.block-for-linus

nfsd's  |   1   |   2   |   4   |   8
--------+---------------+-------+------
deadline| 46102 | 71151 | 83120 | 82330


Notice the drop for 4 and 8 threads.  It may be worth noting that the
default number of NFSD threads is 8.

Cheers,
Jeff

             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23 14:01 Jeff Moyer [this message]
2009-05-08 19:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11  8:14   ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-11 13:53     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-11 16:58       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-13  3:29         ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-13  3:44           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-13 14:58             ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-13 16:20               ` Olga Kornievskaia
2009-05-13 16:32                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-13 18:16                   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2009-05-13 19:06                     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-13 18:25                   ` Jim Rees
2009-05-13 19:45                     ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-13 19:29               ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-13 23:45                 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-14 13:34                   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-14 14:33                     ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-14 14:38                       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-14 15:00                       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-17 19:10                         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-17 19:12                           ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-18 14:15                             ` Jeff Moyer
2009-05-22 23:45                               ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-14 17:55                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-14 18:26                     ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-15 21:37                       ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49hc0f79k9.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®