mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] blk-mq: fix plugging in blk_sq_make_request
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:02:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49k31xc0ae.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

The following appears in blk_sq_make_request:

	/*
	 * If we have multiple hardware queues, just go directly to
	 * one of those for sync IO.
	 */

We clearly don't have multiple hardware queues, here!  This comment was
introduced with this commit 07068d5b8e (blk-mq: split make request
handler for multi and single queue):

    We want slightly different behavior from them:
    
    - On single queue devices, we currently use the per-process plug
      for deferred IO and for merging.
    
    - On multi queue devices, we don't use the per-process plug, but
      we want to go straight to hardware for SYNC IO.

The old code had this:

        use_plug = !is_flush_fua && ((q->nr_hw_queues == 1) || !is_sync);

and that was converted to:

	use_plug = !is_flush_fua && !is_sync;

which is not equivalent.  For the single queue case, that second half of
the && expression is always true.  So, what I think was actually inteded
follows (and this more closely matches what is done in blk_queue_bio).

I haven't done any performance testing of this yet.  I'd really just
like to see if I've got the intent right first.  Jens?

Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 1d016fc..1cd90c0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1208,16 +1208,11 @@ static void blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	const int is_sync = rw_is_sync(bio->bi_rw);
 	const int is_flush_fua = bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA);
-	unsigned int use_plug, request_count = 0;
+	struct blk_plug *plug;
+	unsigned int request_count = 0;
 	struct blk_map_ctx data;
 	struct request *rq;
 
-	/*
-	 * If we have multiple hardware queues, just go directly to
-	 * one of those for sync IO.
-	 */
-	use_plug = !is_flush_fua && !is_sync;
-
 	blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
 
 	if (bio_integrity_enabled(bio) && bio_integrity_prep(bio)) {
@@ -1225,7 +1220,7 @@ static void blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (use_plug && !blk_queue_nomerges(q) &&
+	if (!blk_queue_nomerges(q) &&
 	    blk_attempt_plug_merge(q, bio, &request_count))
 		return;
 
@@ -1244,21 +1239,18 @@ static void blk_sq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 	 * utilize that to temporarily store requests until the task is
 	 * either done or scheduled away.
 	 */
-	if (use_plug) {
-		struct blk_plug *plug = current->plug;
-
-		if (plug) {
-			blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
-			if (list_empty(&plug->mq_list))
-				trace_block_plug(q);
-			else if (request_count >= BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT) {
-				blk_flush_plug_list(plug, false);
-				trace_block_plug(q);
-			}
-			list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &plug->mq_list);
-			blk_mq_put_ctx(data.ctx);
-			return;
+	plug = current->plug;
+	if (plug) {
+		blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
+		if (list_empty(&plug->mq_list))
+			trace_block_plug(q);
+		else if (request_count >= BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT) {
+			blk_flush_plug_list(plug, false);
+			trace_block_plug(q);
 		}
+		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &plug->mq_list);
+		blk_mq_put_ctx(data.ctx);
+		return;
 	}
 
 	if (!blk_mq_merge_queue_io(data.hctx, data.ctx, rq, bio)) {

             reply	other threads:[~2014-12-11 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-11 22:02 Jeff Moyer [this message]
2014-12-11 22:23 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-12 14:45   ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49k31xc0ae.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®