From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: zach.brown@oracle.com, linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching [more performance numbers]
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:09:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49k4z72yop.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007105259.GD8703@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:52:59 +0200")
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writes:
> So here's a pretty basic test. It does random reads from a bunch of
> devices, I tested both 4kb and 64kb block sizes. Queue depth used is 32
> for both cases, but note that this test uses a thread per device (so the
> queue depth is 32 per device). Results are averaged over 3 runs.
> slat/clat are the submission and completion latencies, they are in
> microseconds here.
>
> 4kb random reads
>
> kernel sys IOPS slat clat
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 2.6.32-rc3+patch 25.8% 192500 7.9 2606
> 2.6.32-rc3 27.4% 191300 8.4 2612
>
>
>
> 64kb random reads
>
> kernel sys IOPS slat clat
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 2.6.32-rc3+patch 2.5% 24590 9.7 9681
> 2.6.32-rc3 2.5% 24580 9.4 9691
>
> So pretty close, nothing earth shattering here. What the results above
> do not show is that the 4kb test runs very stable with your patch.
> Mainline fluctuates somewhat in the bandwidth, most likely due to the
> varying depth.
OK, good news. Thanks for testing!
Cheers,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-02 22:54 [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching Jeff Moyer
2009-10-02 22:56 ` [patch v4 1/2] block: get rid of the WRITE_ODIRECT flag Jeff Moyer
2009-10-02 22:57 ` [patch v4 2/2] aio: implement request batching Jeff Moyer
2009-10-02 22:58 ` [patch v4 0/3] " Jeff Moyer
2009-10-06 17:45 ` [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching [more performance numbers] Jeff Moyer
2009-10-06 18:06 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 18:18 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-07 10:52 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 12:09 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2009-10-27 16:16 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-28 8:28 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49k4z72yop.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®