From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix the max path calculation in radix-tree.c
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:39:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49r6lmkol5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070822013546.GB6799@wotan.suse.de> (Nick Piggin's message of "Wed\, 22 Aug 2007 03\:35\:46 +0200")
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 03:48:42PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A while back, Nick Piggin introduced a patch to reduce the node memory
>> usage for small files (commit cfd9b7df4abd3257c9e381b0e445817b26a51c0c):
>>
>> -#define RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT 6
>> +#define RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL ? 4 : 6)
>>
>> Unfortunately, he didn't take into account the fact that the
>> calculation of the maximum path was based on an assumption of having
>> to round up:
>>
>> #define RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH (RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS/RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT + 2)
>>
>> So, if CONFIG_BASE_SMALL is set, you will end up with a
>> RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH that is one greater than necessary. The practical
>> upshot of this is just a bit of wasted memory (one long in the
>> height_to_maxindex array, an extra pre-allocated radix tree node per
>> cpu, and extra stack usage in a couple of functions), but it seems
>> worth getting right.
>>
>> It's also worth noting that I never build with CONFIG_BASE_SMALL.
>> What I did to test this was duplicate the code in a small user-space
>> program and check the results of the calculations for max path and the
>> contents of the height_to_maxindex array.
>>
>
> OK, after you DIV_ROUND_UP, what is the extra 1 for? For paths, it is because
> they are NULL terminated paths I guess (without remembering too hard), and for
> height_to_maxindex array it is needed for 0-height trees I think. So it would
> be kinda cleaner to have the _real_ MAX_PATH, and two other constants for
> this array and the paths arrays (that just happen to be identical due to
> implementation). Don't you think?
>
> But that's not to nack this patch. On the contrary I think your logic is
> correct, and it should be fixed. I didn't check the maths myself but I trust
> you :)
Hi, Nick,
As I said, I wasn't sure what to name the constants for the path and
height arrays, so I just commented the +1 there. I've been running
this on one of my 64bit test systems successfully for about a day,
now. The one code path I was concerned about was
radix_tree_node_alloc, since the prealloc array changes size with this
patch. I stepped through the code by hand and it looks right to me.
Additionally, I wrote a kprobe that would simulate the
kmem_cache_alloc failure. I then inserted a node at max height into
an empty tree with preemption disabled. I verified, using the crash
utility, that the tree was constructed and filled in properly.
You can find the kprobe at http://people.redhat.com/jmoyer/radix-tree/.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
diff --git a/lib/radix-tree.c b/lib/radix-tree.c
index 514efb2..d2655cb 100644
--- a/lib/radix-tree.c
+++ b/lib/radix-tree.c
@@ -60,9 +60,14 @@ struct radix_tree_path {
};
#define RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS (8 /* CHAR_BIT */ * sizeof(unsigned long))
-#define RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH (RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS/RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT + 2)
+#define RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH (DIV_ROUND_UP(RADIX_TREE_INDEX_BITS, \
+ RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT))
-static unsigned long height_to_maxindex[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH] __read_mostly;
+/*
+ * The height_to_maxindex array needs to be one deeper than the maximum
+ * path as height 0 holds only 1 entry.
+ */
+static unsigned long height_to_maxindex[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH + 1] __read_mostly;
/*
* Radix tree node cache.
@@ -487,7 +492,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_tag_set);
void *radix_tree_tag_clear(struct radix_tree_root *root,
unsigned long index, unsigned int tag)
{
- struct radix_tree_path path[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH], *pathp = path;
+ /*
+ * The radix tree path needs to be one longer than the maximum path
+ * since the "list" is null terminated.
+ */
+ struct radix_tree_path path[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH + 1], *pathp = path;
struct radix_tree_node *slot = NULL;
unsigned int height, shift;
@@ -882,7 +891,11 @@ static inline void radix_tree_shrink(struct radix_tree_root *root)
*/
void *radix_tree_delete(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned long index)
{
- struct radix_tree_path path[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH], *pathp = path;
+ /*
+ * The radix tree path needs to be one longer than the maximum path
+ * since the "list" is null terminated.
+ */
+ struct radix_tree_path path[RADIX_TREE_MAX_PATH + 1], *pathp = path;
struct radix_tree_node *slot = NULL;
struct radix_tree_node *to_free;
unsigned int height, shift;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-29 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-21 19:48 Jeff Moyer
2007-08-22 1:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-08-22 20:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2007-08-29 21:39 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2007-08-30 1:25 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49r6lmkol5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®