mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: Limit the number of requests in the bio list
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:30:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49txubvd9d.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121002195934.GA2657@devil.redhat.com> (Dave Chinner's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:59:34 +1000")

Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:52:05AM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> > Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:52:19 -0400
>> > From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
>> > To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
>> >     Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: Limit the number of requests in the bio list
>> > 
>> > Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> writes:
>> > 
>> > > Currently there is not limitation of number of requests in the loop bio
>> > > list. This can lead into some nasty situations when the caller spawns
>> > > tons of bio requests taking huge amount of memory. This is even more
>> > > obvious with discard where blkdev_issue_discard() will submit all bios
>> > > for the range and wait for them to finish afterwards. On really big loop
>> > > devices this can lead to OOM situation as reported by Dave Chinner.
>> > >
>> > > With this patch we will wait in loop_make_request() if the number of
>> > > bios in the loop bio list would exceed 'nr_requests' number of requests.
>> > > We'll wake up the process as we process the bios form the list.
>> > 
>> > I think you might want to do something similar to what is done for
>> > request_queues by implementing a congestion on and off threshold.  As
>> > Jens writes in this commit (predating the conversion to git):
>> 
>> Right, I've had the same idea. However my first proof-of-concept
>> worked quite well without this and my simple performance testing did
>> not show any regression.

Did you look at system time?

-Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-03 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27 17:33 Lukas Czerner
2012-10-01 16:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-10-02  8:52   ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-10-02 19:59     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-03 14:30       ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2012-10-03 15:01         ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-10-03 15:05           ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49txubvd9d.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®