From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761299AbYD3OsQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:48:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757098AbYD3Or7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:47:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45339 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756004AbYD3Or6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:47:58 -0400 From: Jeff Moyer To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , linux-aio , Zach Brown , Clark Williams Subject: Re: AIO/DIO lockup/crash References: <1209385782.13978.17.camel@twins> <20080428090857.beb19a20.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1209404909.13978.23.camel@twins> X-PGP-KeyID: 1F78E1B4 X-PGP-CertKey: F6FE 280D 8293 F72C 65FD 5A58 1FF8 A7CA 1F78 E1B4 X-PCLoadLetter: What the f**k does that mean? Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:46:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1209404909.13978.23.camel@twins> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:48:29 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra writes: > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 09:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> erk, that's dio->bio_lock, isn't it? > > Yep. > >> That lock is super-simple and hasn't changed in quite some time. If there >> has been major memory wreckage and we're simply grabbing at a "lock" in >> random memory then I'd expect the bug to maninfest in different ways on >> different runs? > > Looks like it. > >> I assume you have lots of runtime debugging options enabled. > > Not on this particular run. I'll start a -git run this evening with most > of the debugging option enabled. It takes a few hours to reproduce, so I > let it run over-night. Peter, any update on this? FWIW, I've been running the aio-dio-invalidate-failure test on a fedora kernel (2.6.25-8.fc9.i686) for several days now without any problems. However, I'm not sure I can reproduce the bugs at all. I'll revert to a 2.6.24 kernel and try. Cheers, Jeff