From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: "Zhang\, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tiobench read 50% regression with 2.6.30-rc1
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:25:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49ws9mgnv0.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090415062649.GO5178@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:26:49 +0200")
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 15 2009, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> I tested this using iozone to read a file from an NFS client. The
>> iozone command line was:
>> iozone -s 2000000 -r 64 -f /mnt/test/testfile -i 1 -w
>>
>> The numbers in the nfsd's row represent the number of nfsd threads. I
>> included numbers for the deadline scheduler as well for comparison.
>>
>> v2.6.29
>>
>> nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8
>> --------+---------------+-------+------
>> cfq | 91356 | 66391 | 61942 | 51674
>> deadline| 43207 | 67436 | 96289 | 107784
>>
>> 2.6.30-rc1
>>
>> nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8
>> --------+---------------+-------+------
>> cfq | 43127 | 22354 | 20858 | 21179
>> deadline| 43732 | 68059 | 76659 | 83231
>>
>> 2.6.30-rc1 + cfq fix
>>
>> nfsd's | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8
>> --------+-----------------+-------+------
>> cfq | 114602 | 102280 | 43479 | 43160
>>
>> As you can see, for 1 and 2 threads, the patch *really* helps out. We
>> still don't get back the performance for 4 and 8 nfsd threads, though.
>> It's interesting to note that the deadline scheduler regresses for 4 and
>> 8 threads, as well. I think we've still got some digging to do.
>
> Wow, that does indeed look pretty good!
Please don't lose the later part of the message, which is that both CFQ
and deadline regress for 4 and 8 threads when moving from 2.6.29 to
2.6.30-rc1! There have been way too many changes to keep track of in
this area recently, and I'd like to get some confidence that we
understand the performance implications of them.
>> I'll try the cfq close cooperator patches next.
>
> I have a pending update on the coop patch that isn't pushed out yet, I
> hope to have it finalized and tested later today. Hopefully, with that,
> we should be able to maintain > 100Mb/sec for 4 and 8 threads.
OK, please let me know when and where this is available and I'll give it
a try.
Cheers,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 8:29 Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-09 9:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-10 2:29 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-10 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-14 12:14 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-15 1:27 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-04-15 6:27 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-15 4:07 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-04-15 6:26 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-15 11:25 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2009-04-15 11:30 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-15 12:00 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49ws9mgnv0.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®