On Mon, Sep 24 2012, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Ah, right.  I also thought about that first but than started worrying
> that it could produce unnecessary zeros if the loop iterates at least
> once and exits with r being zero, but now I see that this cannot happen
> since if the loop condition was true, r >= 10000 and it has been divided
> by 10000 in the loop so now it's at least 1.
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I of course meant “10” and “at least 1000”.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--