From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com,
Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: move stack_canary to the start of the randomizable region
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:16:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xhsmhecjg38no.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509035014.2220372-1-tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
On 09/05/26 11:50, Ruidong Tian wrote:
> task_struct keeps growing over time. On architectures that compute the
> per-task stack canary offset from asm-offsets.h and pass it to the
> compiler via -mstack-protector-guard-offset=, this growth eventually
> pushes stack_canary beyond what the target ISA can encode.
>
> On RISC-V, canary loads are emitted as
>
> ld t0, TSK_STACK_CANARY(tp)
>
> where TSK_STACK_CANARY must fit into a 12-bit signed immediate, i.e.
> [-2048, 2047]. Once stack_canary sits past byte 2047 of task_struct,
> the build fails with
>
> cc1: error: '<N>' is not a valid offset in
> '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
>
> * On RISC-V, CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK depends on !RANDSTRUCT,
> so randomized_struct_fields_start/end always expand to nothing and
> stack_canary lands at a small, stable offset well within the
> 12-bit signed immediate range. The build error goes away.
>
> * On architectures that enable RANDSTRUCT for hardening, stack_canary
> stays inside the randomized region and is still shuffled together
> with the other fields by the layout randomization, so its hardening
> coverage is preserved. asm-offsets-based architectures read the
> shuffled offset at build time, so the generated canary accesses
> remain correct.
>
> pahole on a typical 64-bit config shows that the area around the
> wakee_* fields already contains a usable hole:
>
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 72 4 */
> /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
> unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
>
> Move wakee_flips to sit after last_wakee. That opens up a clean
> 8-byte slot at offset 72 into which stack_canary fits exactly:
>
> struct __call_single_node wake_entry; /* 56 16 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
> unsigned long stack_canary; /* 72 8 */
> unsigned long int wakee_flip_decay_ts; /* 80 8 */
> struct task_struct * last_wakee; /* 88 8 */
> unsigned int wakee_flips; /* 96 4 */
>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 3:50 Ruidong Tian
2026-05-12 16:16 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2026-08-21 17:11 ` Charles Mirabile
2026-11-06 15:29 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-11-06 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 11:15 ` Valentin Schneider
2026-11-12 13:33 ` Ron Economos
2026-11-12 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-13 13:09 ` Ron Economos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xhsmhecjg38no.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb \
--to=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®