From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89944C4332F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230239AbiLOSfL (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:35:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230131AbiLOSen (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:34:43 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB9A252A5 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:32:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671129155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iB3EgU//2XXLYrZd0Up3941soIDemxGFb1c6VyqrhV8=; b=bFYX+6ASE9kjni+P2E9VBw6Iy8FYXQlOo/ogH0gVKk87yqMkbBy8fGdSnBw8Bj9aFLgRqG NHxHoI36vXECXWn5rZCST68Wvs/IR9RXbWsXCmX2Xkxceg8FB+APEcyC3cgTBziID3IBT0 qv8996ZfKOGz+sGgX4WWn9xbYu/LI3Q= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-582-B9FOM99MNcOwDuIX1PyPwg-1; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:32:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: B9FOM99MNcOwDuIX1PyPwg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id c126-20020a1c3584000000b003cfffcf7c1aso1494210wma.0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:32:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iB3EgU//2XXLYrZd0Up3941soIDemxGFb1c6VyqrhV8=; b=YEqiS184FBWV6M39qcUhTPsNVi/en4HZUFxXyKc40KJ3/6wX4bqQGMrZN4uZjcqhoF pGfVLXNmQqbUqxZNvIGL+KlpSpmBUQiP1GWCgjBO3eGEuZ2iNi4bPeDvxfw+xGcmwbS0 5kLc45SDq1Hu6o+PV3/3GXsljduFDScl6J0GqlC61UdwXWhgbBoaraZOCpL9TFMnDx2e 9sCBAA7P53/HcKgFnN26Bp/5UYBpB4QrbvfUugVcjHUolipY8oGB75bh8b2YoxIv1unh toECEfOmp45saRVp60pPXpLeUBSxMrj9J7z1LwnUR90xaZV3oRdipNXEhTDx86QpBWTF 7ukw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk8yBGYxagv7v6Vlz+YemdxLNwjjg3WHPm32RW4XgT2/md1B0bV 1jf/OOMVnAkR0ppAYyLoCx18aXTFzIZzR55fdy69/VuoSJibLbUDlEetG6N7H2arhN3qgqlv9CI 8TDga6i/nVsf57HK80gYMYJu8 X-Received: by 2002:adf:e9c1:0:b0:243:2077:8d3b with SMTP id l1-20020adfe9c1000000b0024320778d3bmr19522863wrn.5.1671129152203; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:32:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7p7q5OcjcrxTVQnr8+ucXYoXYB16s894QRntB9KrPkkH8ifQeQZ51M19MCeGUhhusF1pllBA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e9c1:0:b0:243:2077:8d3b with SMTP id l1-20020adfe9c1000000b0024320778d3bmr19522854wrn.5.1671129152010; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from vschneid.remote.csb ([154.57.232.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18-20020adfec12000000b00236488f62d6sm92212wrn.79.2022.12.15.10.32.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:32:31 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: Yury Norov Cc: Tariq Toukan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread() In-Reply-To: References: <20221213043248.2025029-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:32:30 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/12/22 08:48, Yury Norov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:47:47AM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> On 12/12/22 20:32, Yury Norov wrote: >> > Now that we have an iterator-based alternative for a very common case >> > of using cpumask_local_spread for all cpus in a row, it's worth to >> > mention it in comment to cpumask_local_spread(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov >> > --- >> > >> > Hi Tariq, Valentin, >> > >> > I rebased your iterators patches on top of cpumask_local_spread() rework. >> > (Rebase is not plain simple.) The result is on bitmap-for-next branch, >> > and in -next too. >> > >> >> I had a look, LGTM. > > Does it mean reviewed-by? If so - for the whole cpumask_local_spread() > series, or for the last patch? Ah sorry, I meant I had a look at your branch for the result of the rebase which looks sane to me. Feel free to add Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider for this patch.