mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
To: "Aaron Lu" <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
Cc: "Daehyeon Ko" <4ncienth@gmail.com>,
	 "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 "Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	 "Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	 "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	 "Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	 "K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	 "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Clear throttle state when leaving the fair class
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 13:39:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xm26a4nwi6ly.fsf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029032740.GA2901802@bytedance.com> (Aaron Lu's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:27:40 +0800")

"Aaron Lu" <ziqianlu@bytedance.com> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 03:24:11PM -0700, Benjamin Segall wrote:
>> Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Task-based CFS bandwidth throttling removes a task's fair sched_entity
>> > while the scheduler core still considers the task queued. p->throttled
>> > carries the fair-specific state across dequeue/enqueue operations.
>> >
>> > DEQUEUE_CLASS removes the task from cfs_rq->throttled_limbo_list
>> > but retains the bit. If the last finite CFS quota is disabled while
>> > the task runs in another class, it is absent from the unthrottle walk and
>> > the bit survives.
>> > Returning to fair while cfs_bandwidth_used() is false then performs a real
>> > fair enqueue with p->throttled still set.
>> >
>> > After bandwidth is re-enabled, a class-change dequeue treats the
>> > stale bit as limbo state and skips __dequeue_task(). p->se.on_rq therefore
>> > remains set, and put_prev_task_fair() places the entity in the EEVDF tree
>> > while the task moves to RT. On exit, the fair picker can select the
>> > TASK_DEAD task. __schedule() then returns to do_task_dead(),
>> > which hits BUG().
>> >
>> > Keep p->throttled across migrations and group moves, but clear it on
>> > DEQUEUE_CLASS because fair-specific state must not outlive fair-class
>> > membership. A later return to fair uses the normal enqueue path. That path
>> > still respects a throttled cfs_rq.
>> >
>> > A KASAN, LOCKDEP and DEBUG_LIST v7.3 kernel reproduced the do_task_dead()
>> > BUG in 3/3 root and 3/3 delegated uid-1000 runs with CapPrm=CapEff=0 and
>> > RLIMIT_RTPRIO=1. The fix passed both matrices plus a 3/3 class-switch
>> > control with bandwidth continuously enabled, without a scheduler warning,
>> > KASAN report, lockdep splat or crash.
>> >
>> > An AI coding assistant analyzed the state mismatch and drafted the initial
>> > reproducer, fix candidate and this changelog. The source paths, trigger,
>> > controls and results were rechecked against the cited revisions.
>> >
>> > Fixes: e1fad12dcb66 ("sched/fair: Switch to task based throttle model")
>> > Signed-off-by: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> > ---
>> 
>> Yep, sched_class switch lets you smuggle ->throttled into
>> !cfs_bandwidth_used(), and then that check on enqueue_throttled lets you
>> smuggle it onto actually being enqueued, which leads to corruption.
>> That's fun.
>> 
>> I think we need to use switched_from_fair though - if we are currently
>> TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING, sched_class changes will skip going into
>> dequeue_task_fair at all, so we will not see the DEQUEUE_CLASS.
>
> sched class change serializes with migration I think, with task_rq_lock()
> which waits for migration to settle, so this should not happen?

Right, of course, sigh. So then this should indeed be fine.

Reviewed-By: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-22 23:52 Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-23 11:52 ` Aaron Lu
2026-10-28 22:24 ` Benjamin Segall
2026-10-29  3:27   ` Aaron Lu
2026-10-29 20:39     ` Benjamin Segall [this message]
2026-10-29  3:39   ` K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xm26a4nwi6ly.fsf@google.com \
    --to=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®