From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix lockdep warning for event_control
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:33:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xr93hao9ifag.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121128210719.GB24683@htj.dyndns.org> (Tejun Heo's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:07:19 -0800")
On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Greg.
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:15:42PM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> @@ -4276,6 +4276,7 @@ static int cgroup_destroy_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>> struct cgroup_event *event, *tmp;
>> struct cgroup_subsys *ss;
>> + struct list_head tmp_list;
>
> LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
>
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&d->d_inode->i_mutex);
>> lockdep_assert_held(&cgroup_mutex);
>> @@ -4330,16 +4331,20 @@ static int cgroup_destroy_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>> /*
>> * Unregister events and notify userspace.
>> * Notify userspace about cgroup removing only after rmdir of cgroup
>> - * directory to avoid race between userspace and kernelspace
>> + * directory to avoid race between userspace and kernelspace. Use
>> + * a temporary list to avoid a deadlock with cgroup_event_wake(). Since
>> + * cgroup_event_wake() is called with the wait queue head locked,
>> + * remove_wait_queue() cannot be called while holding event_list_lock.
>> */
>> spin_lock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &cgrp->event_list, list) {
>> + list_replace_init(&cgrp->event_list, &tmp_list);
>
> list_splice_init();
>
> would be more conventional, I think.
I used list_replace_init() because it avoided unnecessary init of
tmp_list. But I have no objection to list_splice_init(). I'll repost
with list_splice_init().
>> + spin_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &tmp_list, list) {
>> list_del(&event->list);
>
> Maybe convert this to list_del_init() while at it?
I assume this isn't technically required, but defensive. Seems like we
should also convert the list_del(&event->list) in cgroup_event_wake()
for consistency. I'll send these in separate patch.
>> remove_wait_queue(event->wqh, &event->wait);
>> eventfd_signal(event->eventfd, 1);
>> schedule_work(&event->remove);
>> }
>> - spin_unlock(&cgrp->event_list_lock);
>
> Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-28 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 20:15 Greg Thelen
2012-11-28 21:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-28 21:33 ` Greg Thelen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xr93hao9ifag.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=adurbin@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®