From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761378AbYETRYp (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 13:24:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756022AbYETRYh (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 13:24:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:47140 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755592AbYETRYg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 13:24:36 -0400 To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Andrew Morton , systemtap@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport uts_sem References: <20080505182937.GZ17139@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:16:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080505182937.GZ17139@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (Adrian Bunk's message of "Mon, 5 May 2008 21:29:37 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk writes: > With the removal of the Solaris binary emulation the export of > uts_sem became unused. [...] > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(uts_sem); Am I correct that this would makes it invalid for modules to call utsname() (since the protective semaphore is now hidden)? Systemtap has been using them in order to validate the modules it builds against possible kernel vs. kernel-devel differences. - FChE