mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk>
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Announce:  Sysprof 1.0 -- a sampling, systemwide Linux profiler
Date: 18 Sep 2005 00:05:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ye8slw38i5g.fsf@horse06.daimi.au.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050917211656.GA27448@outpost.ds9a.nl>

bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl> writes:

> How is this different from oprofile? 
> 
> Looks like you did an exact, but less capable, reimplementation.

The kernel module is indeed less capable by itself, but the userspace
tools are a lot easier to use and show you significantly more
details. Oprofile may have improved since then, but when I started
sysprof:

- oprofile didn't work on anything but smp kernels

- oprofile could not produce callgraph information without not only
  recompiling my kernel, but also patching the kernel

- oprofile had a user interface that I simply didn't understand. As I
  remember it, I had to know about performance counters and how to
  translate those into binary masks

Contrast with sysprof, where you

        - insert the module
        - hit the start button
        - do the thing you want to profile
        - hit the profile button

and you get data presented in a way that is just a whole lot more
useful than the flat text files generated by oprofile.



Søren

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-17 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-17 21:05 Soeren Sandmann
2005-09-17 21:16 ` John Levon
2005-09-17 21:16 ` bert hubert
2005-09-17 22:05   ` Soeren Sandmann [this message]
2005-09-17 22:20     ` John Levon
2005-09-17 23:03       ` Soeren Sandmann
2005-09-18  0:25         ` Anton Blanchard
2005-09-17 23:28       ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-09-17 23:53         ` John Levon
2005-09-18  8:45     ` bert hubert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ye8slw38i5g.fsf@horse06.daimi.au.dk \
    --to=sandmann@daimi.au.dk \
    --cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®