From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB85C19759 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A7E22BED for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387570AbfHGIBs (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 04:01:48 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:48496 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727673AbfHGIBr (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 04:01:47 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x777x6Ku134586 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 04:01:47 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u7tf38rs2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 04:01:45 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 09:01:43 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 7 Aug 2019 09:01:41 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7781MrA33096110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:01:22 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3EEA4069; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:01:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692F2A405B; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:01:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.152.212.168]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:01:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:01:39 +0200 From: Vasily Gorbik To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: add OBJSIZE variable for the size tool References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19080708-0008-0000-0000-000003062BED X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19080708-0009-0000-0000-00004A242D49 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-07_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=997 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908070085 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:32:04AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 7:56 PM Vasily Gorbik wrote: > > > > Define and export OBJSIZE variable for "size" tool from binutils to be > > used in architecture specific Makefiles (naming the variable just "SIZE" > > would be too risky). In particular this tool is useful to perform checks > > that early boot code is not using bss section (which might have not been > > zeroed yet or intersects with initrd or other files boot loader might > > have put right after the linux kernel). > > > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik > > I think you want to apply both to the s390 tree. If so, > > Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada > > Thanks. Yes, I would take it via s390 tree. Thank you!