From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Mihai Moldovan <ionic@ionic.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/sdvo: Reorder i2c initialisation before ddc proxy
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:40:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yun8vu42hsl.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0d58a$78jc@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1510 bytes --]
On Wed, 18 May 2011 09:04:11 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 18:22:52 -0700, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 May 2011 14:03:50 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > > The ddc proxy depends upon the underlying i2c bus being selected. Under
> > > certain configurations, the i2c-adapter functionality is queried during
> > > initialisation and so may trigger an OOPS during boot. Hence, we need to
> > > reorder the initialisation of the ddc proxy until after we hook up the i2c
> > > adapter for the SDVO device.
> >
> > I'd love more explanation here about how this code ever worked -- what
> > are these 'certain configurations' of which you speak?
>
> The condition under which it fails is when the i2c_add_adapter calls into
> i2c_detect which will attempt to probe all valid addresses on the adapter
> iff there is a pre-existing i2c_driver with the same class as the freshly
> added i2c_adapter.
Lovely.
> So it appears to depend upon having compiled in (or loaded such a module
> before i915.ko) an i2c-driver that likes to futz over the i2c_adapters
> claiming DDC support.
Thanks for your additional explanation, as I said, the patch looks sane
on the face of it (always nice to initialize values before use).
I've marked this as reviewed, added your additional explanation and
merged it to drm-intel-next. Seems like it might like a cc to stable?
--
keith.packard@intel.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 12:05 Kernel BUG with i915 in intel_sdvo_ddc_proxy_func Mihai Moldovan
2011-05-17 12:37 ` Mihai Moldovan
2011-05-17 13:03 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/sdvo: Reorder i2c initialisation before ddc proxy Chris Wilson
2011-05-17 13:49 ` Mihai Moldovan
2011-05-18 1:22 ` Keith Packard
2011-05-18 8:04 ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-18 14:40 ` Keith Packard [this message]
2011-05-18 16:08 ` Mihai Moldovan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yun8vu42hsl.fsf@aiko.keithp.com \
--to=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=ionic@ionic.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome