From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754413AbcAVQtY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:49:24 -0500
Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]:54864 "EHLO unicorn.mansr.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754379AbcAVQtW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:49:22 -0500
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mans@mansr.com>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt controller
References: <569CE0F2.1060507@sigmadesigns.com>
	<569D0B80.1010908@sigmadesigns.com>
	<569D165E.4060004@sigmadesigns.com> <569FAFF5.4090909@arm.com>
	<yw1xr3hcqlix.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <569FB471.8000909@arm.com>
	<yw1xmvs0qkue.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
	<569FB7A9.9080309@sigmadesigns.com>
	<yw1xegdcqk8n.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
	<569FB91D.9030704@sigmadesigns.com>
	<yw1x1t9cqg18.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
	<56A2518F.6060808@sigmadesigns.com>
	<yw1xfuxpmv2f.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
	<56A25ACF.5040205@sigmadesigns.com>
	<yw1x7fj1muv1.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
	<56A25CA3.9000001@sigmadesigns.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:49:19 +0000
In-Reply-To: <56A25CA3.9000001@sigmadesigns.com> (Marc Gonzalez's message of
	"Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:45:23 +0100")
Message-ID: <yw1x37tpmueo.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> writes:

> On 22/01/2016 17:39, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 22/01/2016 17:35, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> With your latest patch, can I drop the ranges property?
>>>>
>>>> Why would you want to do that?
>>>
>>> <confused> I thought that was the whole point of the v4 improvement?
>> 
>> The point was to make it work right *if* someone were to do that even
>> though having it there better reflects what the hardware actually looks
>> like.
>
> That's the part I'm struggling to understand. Who other than you or me
> would write a device tree from scratch for this interrupt controller?

I wouldn't discount the possibility.

-- 
Måns Rullgård