From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754012AbcBHOon (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:44:43 -0500
Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]:58034 "EHLO unicorn.mansr.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753943AbcBHOoj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:44:39 -0500
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mans@mansr.com>
To: Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>
Cc: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800 driver
References: <56B4A445.7080402@laposte.net>
	<yw1x1t8ri8dz.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B4A877.4020800@laposte.net>
	<yw1xsi17gsxl.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B4ACC4.1000607@laposte.net>
	<yw1xoabvgs7s.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B4B013.5030407@laposte.net>
	<yw1xk2mjgraf.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B4B81D.3000108@laposte.net>
	<yw1xfux7gpol.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B4BDDA.9010708@laposte.net>
	<yw1xbn7vgoux.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B86F44.3030806@laposte.net>
	<yw1xfux3fhmq.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> <56B8A21C.5020400@free.fr>
	<56B8A86D.7060403@laposte.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:44:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <56B8A86D.7060403@laposte.net> (Sebastian Frias's message of
	"Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:38:37 +0100")
Message-ID: <yw1x4mdjfei8.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> writes:

> On 02/08/2016 03:11 PM, Mason wrote:
>> On 08/02/2016 14:37, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>
>>> Sebastian Frias wrote:
>>>
>>>> By the way, I know some people like the command line, email, etc. but
>>>> there ought to be other tools better suited for patch review...
>>>
>>> Some kernel subsystems use http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/ to track status
>>> of various patches.
>>
>> There's also a kernel bugzilla, but it may be for actual bugs.
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
>>
>
> Thanks, and what would be the definition of a bug?
> I mean, would the issue from this thread qualify?
> Should I have created a bug report before submitting the patch?

No, that is not necessary.  My understanding is that the bugzilla is
more of a place to report a bug you've found but don't have a patch
for.  Patches always go through the mailing lists.

-- 
Måns Rullgård