From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262085AbUB2Rc7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:32:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262084AbUB2Rc7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:32:59 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:12980 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262085AbUB2RcZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:32:25 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK? Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:32:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1ulUA-33w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <20040229161721.GA16688@hell.org.pl> <20040229162317.GC283@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ti211310a080-4136.bb.online.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MS5LE5xwK87fk1D3hnbdbotrpnA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek writes: > Hi! > >> > Would there be any major screaming if I tried to drop CONFIG_PM_DISK? >> > It seems noone is maintaining it, equivalent functionality is provided >> > by swsusp, and it is confusing users... >> >> It may be ugly, it may be unmaintained, but I get the impression that it >> works for some people for whom swsusp doesn't. So unless swsusp works for >> everyone or Nigel's swsusp2 is merged, I'd suggest leaving that in. > > Do you have example when pmdisk works and swsusp does not? I'm not > aware of any in recent history... For me, none of them (pmdisk, swsusp and swsusp2) work. I did manage to get pmdisk to resume once, and swsusp2 makes it half-way through the resume. The old swsusp doesn't even get that far. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se