From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265864AbTLIO0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:26:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265870AbTLIOWh (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:22:37 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:20444 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265867AbTLIOVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:21:16 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:21:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20031209115806.GA472@reti> <20031209134551.GG472@reti> <20031209141026.GC28465@actcom.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jBky9E9vbdP5sOuDWJu8QN5PIeY= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Muli Ben-Yehuda writes: >> >> I believe 2.6 is the right place for the device mapper. >> > >> > So what's the difference between a new filesystem like XFS and a new >> > device driver like dm ? >> >> None. Neither will go into 2.4, if I've understood things >> correctly. > > You haven't been following lkml, I guess. xfs has been merged to 2.4. Yes, I see that now. After Marcelo had said "no" about a hundred times, I stopped reading anything with xfs in the subject. I guess I should have looked a little bit closer at that last subject. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se