From: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Trivial patch monkey" <trivial@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:52:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1x7ge4x5ir.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380122586.1974.84@driftwood> (Rob Landley's message of "Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:23:06 -0500")
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> writes:
> On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> I'd strongly suggest you make your binutils compatible with newer
>> instruction syntax instead of making the kernel more complex.
>
> Meaning I play whack-a-mole as this becomes permission to depend on
> endless new gnuisms just because they're there and nobody else is
> regression testing against them, not because they actually add anything.
Since when is assembling the instructions correctly, as specified in the
arch ref, and not in some other random way a gnuism?
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 9:30 3.12-rc1: no longer compiles for Nokia n900 (omap based) Pavel Machek
2013-09-19 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2013-09-19 9:57 ` Pavel Machek
2013-09-23 23:59 ` new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 Pavel Machek
2013-09-24 2:13 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-24 12:11 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-24 21:23 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-24 21:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-25 1:13 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-25 2:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-25 15:23 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-25 15:52 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2013-09-26 0:10 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-26 22:24 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-25 16:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-26 22:48 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-27 19:41 ` Pavel Machek
2013-09-28 8:43 ` Pavel Machek
2013-09-25 20:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-25 20:49 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-26 22:50 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-26 7:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-28 9:03 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-09-24 2:20 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-19 9:44 ` 3.12-rc1: no longer compiles for Nokia n900 (omap based), display no longer works Pavel Machek
2013-09-19 18:47 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-09-26 0:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1x7ge4x5ir.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com \
--to=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®