From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262540AbTLSKwi (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:52:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262546AbTLSKus (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:48 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:6809 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262491AbTLSKum (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:42 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: [OT] linux.bkbits.net Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:50:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <3FE2D4D5.2050103@softhome.net> <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NNPUuNYQU8d0nDO7XlB8b6n9lLs= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III writes: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote: >> It is rather strange to 'bk pull http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5' >> and to find in Makefile: >> VERSION = 2 >> PATCHLEVEL = 6 >> SUBLEVEL = 0 >> EXTRAVERSION = >> Or it is only me who finds this strange? >> When transition from 2.5 to 2.6 is planned? >> After all stable branch deserve to have NOT odd version number :) > > You may have missed Linus' announcement: 2.6.0 has been released. That's the point. The kernel version is 2.6.0, but the bitkeeper repository is called linux-2.5. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se