From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261973AbTJXWrQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:47:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261967AbTJXWp7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:45:59 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:48273 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261973AbTJXWpN (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 18:45:13 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: [PM][ACPI] No ACPI interrupts after resume from S1 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:45:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20031020141512.GA30157@hell.org.pl> <20031020184750.GA26154@hell.org.pl> <20031023082534.GD643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <3F98FDDF.1040905@cyberone.com.au> <20031024222347.GB728@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8eVCkvgOte/j7d1pqSf7/K5vj8o= Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek writes: > Try it completely without modules. I'm not sure how it should work > with modules which means it probably does not work at all. Are you saying it doesn't work with any modules? What about all the people who have reported success with suspend-to-disk? I thought everyone used at least some modules. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se