From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265573AbUBKQan (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:30:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265853AbUBKQan (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:30:43 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:44737 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265573AbUBKQam (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:30:42 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net? Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:30:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200402111523.i1BFNnOq020225@work.bitmover.com> <20040211161358.GA11564@favonius> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213-187-164-3.dd.nextgentel.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lohf+RPhwDNNwh5EfLkYU8DD6Hg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sander writes: > Larry McVoy wrote (ao): >> We're moving openlogging back to our offices and I'm experimenting >> with filesystems to see what gives the best performance for BK usage. >> Reiserfs looks pretty good and I'm wondering if anyone knows any >> reasons that we shouldn't use it for bkbits.net. Also, would it help >> if the journal was on a different disk? Most of the bkbits traffic is >> read so I doubt it. >> >> Please cc me, I'm not on the list. > > I've cc'ed the Reiserfs mailinglist. > > IME Reiserfs is a fast and stable fs. If you have the time to benchmark > ext3, reiserfs, jfs and xfs (and ..) with bk then you would know first > hand which fs is best for you. It might be worth the time. If someone does any tests, I'd be interested to hear about the results. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se