From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (Måns Rullgård)
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>,
root@chaos.analogic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
Date: 23 Sep 2002 18:03:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xofaowv5m.fsf@calippo.e.kth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:34:17 -0400"
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> BTW: Have you tried gcc 3.2 with say -finline-limit=2000 too?
> By default gcc 3.2 has for usual C code smaller inlining cutoff, so the IO
> difference might as well be because some important, but big function was
> inlined by 2.95.x and not by 3.2.x. On the other side there is
> __attribute__((always_inline)) which you can use to tell gcc you don't
> want any cutoff for a particular function.
How about using -Winline?
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-23 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-23 6:55 Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 10:30 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 11:03 ` jw schultz
2002-09-23 12:47 ` Erik Andersen
2002-09-23 13:00 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 13:15 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 14:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-23 14:02 ` Ryan Anderson
2002-09-23 14:15 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 14:24 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 14:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-09-23 16:03 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2002-09-23 14:43 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-24 21:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 16:34 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-09-23 21:47 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 1:12 ` jw schultz
2002-09-24 9:18 ` Jan Hudec
2002-09-23 14:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 14:36 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 21:27 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209232236070.27095-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2002-09-24 2:45 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 3:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-24 9:34 ` Jan Hudec
2002-09-24 13:45 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24 9:26 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 14:19 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24 15:47 ` Mark Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xofaowv5m.fsf@calippo.e.kth.se \
--to=mru@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®