From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754523AbcAIMNN (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:13:13 -0500 Received: from unicorn.mansr.com ([81.2.72.234]:50851 "EHLO unicorn.mansr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753507AbcAIMNL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:13:11 -0500 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen , Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Ludovic Desroches , Ulf Hansson , Arnd Bergmann , Andy Shevchenko , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: atmel: get rid of struct mci_dma_data References: <1452302551-24199-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> <1452302551-24199-2-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:13:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Andy Shevchenko's message of "Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:10:27 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Shevchenko writes: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote: >> As struct mci_dma_data is now only used by AVR32, it is nothing but >> pointless indirection. Replace it with struct dw_dma_slave in the >> AVR32 platform code and with a void pointer elsewhere. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard > >> @@ -1376,15 +1375,15 @@ at32_add_device_mci(unsigned int id, struct mci_platform_data *data) >> ARRAY_SIZE(atmel_mci0_resource))) >> goto fail; >> >> - slave = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mci_dma_data), GFP_KERNEL); >> + slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!slave) >> goto fail; >> >> - slave->sdata.dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev; >> - slave->sdata.src_id = 0; >> - slave->sdata.dst_id = 1; >> - slave->sdata.m_master = 1; >> - slave->sdata.p_master = 0; > > Seems you based this on top of our non-submitted yet patches. You're right. I didn't realise this file had been touched by those patches, and I didn't read the code all that carefully when making this change. >> + slave->dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev; >> + slave->src_id = 0; >> + slave->dst_id = 1; >> + slave->m_master = 1; >> + slave->p_master = 0; > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko -- Måns Rullgård