From: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: check for invalid parent index of orphans in __clk_init()
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:37:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xzj0nu4s9.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150413191250.19585.71603@quantum> (Michael Turquette's message of "Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:12:50 -0700")
Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> writes:
> Quoting Rhyland Klein (2015-02-17 08:58:29)
>> On 2/15/2015 7:33 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> > If a mux clock is initialised (by hardware or firmware) with an
>> > invalid parent, its ->get_parent() can return an out of range
>> > index. For example, the generic mux clock attempts to return
>> > -EINVAL, which due to the u8 return type ends up a rather large
>> > number. Using this index with the parent_names[] array results
>> > in an invalid pointer and (usually) a crash in the following
>> > strcmp().
>> >
>> > This patch adds a check for the parent index being in range,
>> > ignoring clocks reporting invalid values.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
>> > Cc: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 ++-
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> > index d48ac71..bc0662b 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> > @@ -1950,7 +1950,8 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
>> > hlist_for_each_entry_safe(orphan, tmp2, &clk_orphan_list, child_node) {
>> > if (orphan->num_parents && orphan->ops->get_parent) {
>> > i = orphan->ops->get_parent(orphan->hw);
>> > - if (!strcmp(clk->name, orphan->parent_names[i]))
>> > + if (i >= 0 && i < orphan->num_parents &&
>> > + !strcmp(clk->name, orphan->parent_names[i]))
>> > __clk_reparent(orphan, clk);
>> > continue;
>> > }
>> >
>>
>> This works for me and is less invasive than the original patch series.
>>
>> Tested-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
>
> Applied.
Did this get lost somewhere? It's not in mainline, and I can't find it
in the clk tree on kernel.org either.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@mansr.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-15 12:33 Mans Rullgard
2015-02-17 16:58 ` Rhyland Klein
2015-04-13 19:12 ` Michael Turquette
2015-09-15 14:37 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2015-09-17 22:25 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xzj0nu4s9.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com \
--to=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®