From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
Cc: kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Junyi Zhao" <junyi.zhao@amlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [DMARC error][DKIM error] [PATCH v7 1/2] pwm: meson: Add support for Amlogic S4 PWM
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:15:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jikyek25k.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce3c2772-8e91-4fd3-b52e-2a35d5759664@salutedevices.com> (George Stark's message of "Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:12:54 +0300")
On Wed 05 Jun 2024 at 15:12, George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com> wrote:
> Hello Kelvin, Junyi
>
> On 6/5/24 05:44, Kelvin Zhang via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Junyi Zhao <junyi.zhao@amlogic.com>
>> Add support for Amlogic S4 PWM.
>> Signed-off-by: Junyi Zhao <junyi.zhao@amlogic.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> index b2f97dfb01bb..4f01847525b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> @@ -460,6 +460,34 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels_meson8b_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>> return meson_pwm_init_clocks_meson8b(chip, mux_parent_data);
>> }
>> +static void meson_pwm_s4_put_clk(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct clk *clk = data;
>> +
>> + clk_put(clk);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int meson_pwm_init_channels_s4(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = pwmchip_parent(chip);
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < MESON_NUM_PWMS; i++) {
>> + meson->channels[i].clk = of_clk_get(np, i);
>> + if (IS_ERR(meson->channels[i].clk)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(meson->channels[i].clk);
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get clk\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, meson_pwm_s4_put_clk,
>> + meson->channels[i].clk);
>
> devm_add_action_or_reset() result should be checked
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> You can rewrite it a bit to always have a single allocation for devm node:
>
> static void meson_pwm_s4_put_clk(void *data)
> {
> struct meson_pwm *meson = data;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < MESON_NUM_PWMS; i++)
> clk_put(meson->channels[i].clk);
> }
This has already been discussed on v6.
This make the code un-necessarily complex and potentially put clock that
have not even been claimed.
>
> static int meson_pwm_init_channels_s4(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> {
> struct device *dev = pwmchip_parent(chip);
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
> int i, ret;
>
> ret = devm_add_action(dev, meson_pwm_s4_put_clk, meson);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> for (i = 0; i < MESON_NUM_PWMS; i++) {
> meson->channels[i].clk = of_clk_get(np, i);
> if (IS_ERR(meson->channels[i].clk)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(meson->channels[i].clk);
> dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get clk\n");
> return ret;
> }
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Jerome
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 2:44 [PATCH v7 0/2] " Kelvin Zhang via B4 Relay
2024-06-05 2:44 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] pwm: meson: " Kelvin Zhang via B4 Relay
2024-06-05 12:12 ` [DMARC error][DKIM error] " George Stark
2024-06-12 8:15 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2024-06-05 2:44 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: amlogic: Add " Kelvin Zhang via B4 Relay
2024-06-05 8:48 ` [DMARC error][DKIM error] " George Stark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1jikyek25k.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gnstark@salutedevices.com \
--cc=junyi.zhao@amlogic.com \
--cc=kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®